From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Graeme Gregory Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64 Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:45:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20140816124532.GA25975@xora-haswell.xora.org.uk> References: <1406206825-15590-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1406206825-15590-20-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Len Brown Cc: Mark Rutland , Mark Brown , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Lv Zheng , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Daniel Lezcano , Robert Moore , linux acpi , Grant Likely , Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com, Robert Richter , Jason Cooper , Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , Liviu Dudau , linaro-acpi-private@linaro.org, Bjorn Helgaas , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Graeme Gregory , Randy Dunlap , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 06:43:10PM -0400, Len Brown wrote: > > Additional driver specific > > +data should be passed in the appropriate _DSM (ACPI Section 9.14.1) method or > > +_DSD (ACPI Section 6.2.5). > > Re: _DSD > > Yes. > > Re: _DSM > > No, not if it can be handled by _DSD. > > cheers, > Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center Thanks good point, Ill update that paragraph to indicate preference on _DSD. Graeme From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gg@slimlogic.co.uk (Graeme Gregory) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:45:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64 In-Reply-To: References: <1406206825-15590-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1406206825-15590-20-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20140816124532.GA25975@xora-haswell.xora.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 06:43:10PM -0400, Len Brown wrote: > > Additional driver specific > > +data should be passed in the appropriate _DSM (ACPI Section 9.14.1) method or > > +_DSD (ACPI Section 6.2.5). > > Re: _DSD > > Yes. > > Re: _DSM > > No, not if it can be handled by _DSD. > > cheers, > Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center Thanks good point, Ill update that paragraph to indicate preference on _DSD. Graeme