From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: Performance regression on kernels 3.10 and newer Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:51:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20140821.165136.653027228264864005.davem@davemloft.net> References: <53ED4354.9090904@intel.com> <20140814.162024.2218312002979492106.davem@davemloft.net> <53EE4023.6080902@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: alexander.h.duyck@intel.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:44227 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751401AbaHUXvi (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2014 19:51:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <53EE4023.6080902@intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Alexander Duyck Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 10:15:15 -0700 > This is one of the reasons why I keep asking if someone can tell me > what the use case is for this where it performs well. It allows the TCP connection to be paced by the process scheduler's ability to put the thread doing the I/O on a cpu.