From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Zhang Haoyu" Subject: [question] e1000 interrupt storm happened because of its corresponding ioapic->irr bit always set Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 18:36:40 +0800 Message-ID: <201408231836387399956@sangfor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "qemu-devel" , "kvm" Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Hi, all I use a qemu-1.4.1/qemu-2.0.0 to run win7 guest, and encounter e1000 NIC interrupt storm, because "if (!ent->fields.mask && (ioapic->irr & (1 << i)))" is always true in __kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(). Any ideas? Thanks, Zhang Haoyu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33265) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XL8j4-00038m-UX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 06:39:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XL8iy-00072f-RA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 06:39:14 -0400 Received: from [58.251.49.30] (port=59826 helo=mail.sangfor.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XL8iy-0006wh-Bs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 06:39:08 -0400 Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 18:36:40 +0800 From: "Zhang Haoyu" Message-ID: <201408231836387399956@sangfor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] [question] e1000 interrupt storm happened because of its corresponding ioapic->irr bit always set List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel , kvm Hi, all I use a qemu-1.4.1/qemu-2.0.0 to run win7 guest, and encounter e1000 NIC interrupt storm, because "if (!ent->fields.mask && (ioapic->irr & (1 << i)))" is always true in __kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(). Any ideas? Thanks, Zhang Haoyu