On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 06:20:44PM +0530, Subhransu S. Prusty wrote:

> +	/*allocate device type context*/
> +	sst_init_stream(&sst_drv_ctx->streams[str_id], alloc_param.codec_type,
> +			str_id, alloc_param.operation, 0);
> +	/* send msg to FW to allocate a stream */

/*spaces around the edge of comments like the second not the first*/

This is an issue in quite a lot of places.

> +
> +/**
> +* sst_start_stream - Send msg for a starting stream

/*
 *

> +		sst_fill_header_mrfld(&msg->mrfld_header, IPC_CMD,
> +				str_info->task_id, 1, pvt_id);
> +		msg->mrfld_header.p.header_high.part.res_rqd = 1;
> +		len = sizeof(dsp_hdr);
> +		msg->mrfld_header.p.header_low_payload = len;
> +		sst_fill_header_dsp(&dsp_hdr,
> +					IPC_IA_RESUME_STREAM_MRFLD,
> +					str_info->pipe_id, 0);
> +		memcpy(msg->mailbox_data, &dsp_hdr, sizeof(dsp_hdr));
> +		sst_add_to_dispatch_list_and_post(sst_drv_ctx, msg);
> +		retval = sst_wait_timeout(sst_drv_ctx, block);
> +		sst_free_block(sst_drv_ctx, block);

Can any of this be factored out?  Seems like a lot of duplication in
these operations.