All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
	Dan Aloni <dan@kernelim.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nfs: fix kernel warning when removing proc entry
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 02:41:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140828014123.GF18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ppfvrdux.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:20:38PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > I saw the following kernel warning:
> 
> Cong thanks for finding and tracking this.  I was clearly asleep at the
> switch when I was testing my fix to the nfs client code :(
> 
> I have applied this patch and will push it to Linus after it has a
> little bit to sit in linux-next.

	Why does that code wank with one-by-one remove_proc_entry(), BTW?
remove_proc_subtree("nfsfs", net->proc_net) will take care of the whole pile
just fine, TYVM...  While we are it, there's no need to keep ->proc_nfsfs
at all - just have it in a local variable in nfs_fs_proc_net_init().

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-28  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-16 19:36 [PATCH v2] nfs: fix kernel warning when removing proc entry Cong Wang
2014-08-20  4:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]   ` <alpine.DEB.2.19.4.1408192222470.2758@trent.utfs.org>
2014-08-20 23:16     ` Trond Myklebust
2014-08-20 23:27   ` Trond Myklebust
2014-08-28  1:41   ` Al Viro [this message]
2014-09-08 23:54     ` Trond Myklebust
2014-09-09  2:59       ` Cong Wang
2014-09-08 18:50   ` Matt Mullins
2014-09-08 20:26     ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140828014123.GF18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=dan@kernelim.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.