From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Hall Subject: Re: rte_mbuf: documentation, meta-data, and inconsistencies Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 20:09:16 -0700 Message-ID: <20140829030916.GA26231@mhcomputing.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: daniel chapiesky Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 08:00:59PM -0400, daniel chapiesky wrote: > But, in the end, sharing the meta-data area with the packet headroom seems > to be a very > bad idea. > > Sincerely, > > Daniel Chapiesky You might have picked a good time to inquire about it as some of the Intel guys are making patches to clean up rte_mbuf during the last couple of weeks as we speak. Matthew.