From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Damien Lespiau Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/89] drm/i915/skl: i915_swizzle_info gen9 fix Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:26:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20140904152600.GG25664@strange.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1409830075-11139-1-git-send-email-damien.lespiau@intel.com> <1409830075-11139-6-git-send-email-damien.lespiau@intel.com> <20140904131445.GO15520@phenom.ffwll.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C026E3DB for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:27:48 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140904131445.GO15520@phenom.ffwll.local> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Daniel Vetter Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:14:45PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:26:31PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > From: Robert Beckett > > > > Fix ARB_MODE register read for gen >= 8 in i915_swizzle_info > > > > Signed-off-by: Robert Beckett > > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau > > given that the swizzle stuff is gone, shouldn't we just have a gen9+ > check to do nothing? Well, the swizzled bits are still in the SKL docs, they are really not expected to be used though. We can either still dump them in that debugfs file, or nothing at all. I vote for keeping the dump "just in case", but I can see the alternative working as well. No strong opinion either way. -- Damien