From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:59:59 +0200 From: Alexander Aring To: Martin Townsend Cc: Marcel Holtmann , linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bluetooth-next] Simplify lowpan receive path so skb is freed in lowpan_rcv when dropped. Message-ID: <20140909095958.GD4545@omega> References: <53DCE75C.2030305@xsilon.com> <20140821083945.GA29484@omega> <3DF0C18C-4A97-4A00-AB0F-9E01F72CE967@holtmann.org> <53FE446D.6040805@xsilon.com> <20140908104008.GB6981@omega> <540DF1AE.2070709@xsilon.com> <20140908183652.GA633@omega> <20140908185519.GB633@omega> <540EC844.2040008@xsilon.com> <20140909094652.GC4545@omega> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <20140909094652.GC4545@omega> List-ID: On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:46:52AM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 10:28:36AM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote: > ... > > > I thought more about that, you mean the receiving part only? So the > > > uncompression. The point is that we don't have no interface for an user > > > that can decide if he like to use UDP compression like RFC 6282 or UDP > > > compression like GHC. This is only relevant for the transmit part. So > > > compression is optionally. (We should have some interface to make this > > > configurable by user -> adding this to the nhc layer, later). > > I've implemented compression and decompression. You are right in that we need a mechanism of configuring what gets compressed by what method. > > ok. But how we deal with that currently with GHC UDP and UDP RFC6282 > compression. We can't not support both compression methods. > > btw. how we should call it now? Uncompression or decompression, I can > also name the callbacks to decompression. I am not a native speaker so > I will ask you which is better now. :-) > > > > On the uncompression part, means the receiving part we can support both. > > > UDP RFC 6282 or UDP like GHC, the next header id value should be > > > different there. That means currently we can receive every packets but > > > transmit only RFC6282 compression formats. > > > > > > So for receiving this, it's okay. But for compression, since we don't > > > have some interface to make this configurable we should use RFC 6282. > > So I will ensure UDP is compressed by 6282. Then I was going to start out by just compressing ICMPv6 with GHC and monitor how much data is saved by using GHC. Later on we will implement a mechanism of configuring what gets compressed and by which compression method. > > Okay, you mean that you will leave UDP compression by 6282 but insert a > receive handling (decompression) for UDP GHC? > > RFC6282 doesn't describe any compression/decompression(or uncompression) > format for ICMPv6, so we could handle there compression and > uncompression. I understand now you did it that way, or? > > About the mechanism by user: > > There are several ways about to do it from userspace. I know now sysfs > or netlink. Do you have already some idea how you want to make this > configurable by user? > > > btw. > This reminds me a little bit like setting led trigger type, (blink, > heartbeat, mmc, net, etc...). This is done by sysfs. > > > > > The GHC spec states that a device indicates it's GHC capability using a 6LoWPAN Capability Indication Option (6CIO), this is an ND option. As far as I can see there is no type assigned yet by IANA so I was wondering if we should have this as an experimental configuration item in the kernel? > > Yes, please make a bool into net/6lowpan/Kconfig and add support for > drafts only if selected. > > In code you simple need to use "if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FOO))" to > registration the nhc format into the nhc framework/layer or not. Forget this one, I failed here. We should complete get out the draft implementations when it's not selected by buildsystem. We need something like this here. "Adding dummy functions with ifdefs". #idef CONFIG_FOO /* real prototype */ int lowpan_nhc_add_fancy_format(foo); ... #else static inline int lowpan_nhc_add_fancy_format(foo) { } ... #endif also according to Makefile that we don't build the files which implements "lowpan_nhc_add_fancy_format". - Alex