From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753370AbaIJThj (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:37:39 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172]:33705 "EHLO mail-pd0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752954AbaIJThh (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:37:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:37:32 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 10 Message-ID: <20140910193732.GA29618@roeck-us.net> References: <20140910185920.336180d4@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20140910185920.336180d4@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 06:59:20PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20140909: > > New tree: powerpc-merge-mpe > > The pm tree gained conflicts against the mvebu and arm-soc trees. > > The v4l-dvb tree still had its build failure so I used the version from > next-20140908. > > The net-next tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. > > The wireless-next tree lost its build failure. > > The drm tree still had its build failure for which I applied a merge > fix patch. > > The regulator tree still had its build failure for which I reverted > several commits. > > The trivial tree gained a conflict against the block tree. > > The clk tree gained a conflict against the renesas tree. > > The akpm-current tree lost its build failure. > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4389 > 4067 files changed, 140816 insertions(+), 93267 deletions(-) > I see a large number of build failures. Build results: total: 133 pass: 95 fail: 38 Failed builds: alpha:defconfig alpha:allmodconfig arm:shmobile_defconfig arm:bcm2835_defconfig arm:efm32_defconfig arm:clps711x_defconfig cris:defconfig cris:etrax-100lx_defconfig cris:artpec_3_defconfig cris:etraxfs_defconfig frv:defconfig hexagon:defconfig ia64:defconfig m68k:allmodconfig m68k:m5272c3_defconfig m68k:m5307c3_defconfig m68k:m5249evb_defconfig mips:allmodconfig mips:bcm47xx_defconfig mips:bcm63xx_defconfig mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig mips:ath79_defconfig mips:ar7_defconfig mips:fuloong2e_defconfig mips:cavium_octeon_defconfig mips:malta_defconfig mn10300:asb2303_defconfig parisc:defconfig parisc:generic-32bit_defconfig parisc:a500_defconfig parisc:generic-64bit_defconfig powerpc:85xx/sbc8548_defconfig sh:microdev_defconfig sparc64:allmodconfig unicore32:defconfig xtensa:defconfig xtensa:allmodconfig Key build failures: kernel/built-in.o: In function `irq_work_sync': (.text+0x2cfd8): undefined reference to `module_alloc' kernel/built-in.o: In function `irq_work_sync': (.text+0x2cfe0): undefined reference to `module_free' This is seen for several architectures and drivers. --- drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c: In function ‘serial8250_ioctl’: drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c:2874:7: error: ‘TIOCSRS485’ undeclared (first use in this function) drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c:2886:7: error: ‘TIOCGRS485’ undeclared (first use in this function) Seen for several architectures. For some of the affected architectures I have seen patches on lkml, others such as alpha are still unpatched as far as I can see. --- For sparc64, we also have In file included from drivers/tty/serial/serial_mctrl_gpio.c:21:0: include/uapi/asm-generic/termios.h:22:8: error: redefinition of 'struct termio' ./arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/termbits.h:16:8: note: originally defined here I didn't bother trying runtime tests. Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. Guenter