From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:46:44 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] u-boot-socfpga repository
In-Reply-To: <54112B64.5010104@monstr.eu>
References: <201409110133.20669.marex@denx.de>
	<20140911120912.6E08.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com>
	<54112B64.5010104@monstr.eu>
Message-ID: <201409111746.44601.marex@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Thursday, September 11, 2014 at 06:56:04 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 09/11/2014 05:09 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 01:33:20 +0200
> > 
> > Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> 
> >> I'd be interested in maintaining u-boot-socfpga repository. So far, we
> >> don't have a repo for this platform and there is a large flurry of
> >> patches flying around without any kind of central point for them. I'd
> >> like to get your formal consent for starting this and if you agree, I'd
> >> start sending PR to Albert once the repo is in place.
> > 
> > Me too.  I'd like to own u-boot-uniphier to collect
> > Panasonic-SoC-specific changes.
> > 
> > That would be faster and would not disturb Albert.
> 
> I am not sure if you need to have separate repo to work like this.
> I am keeping zynq patches in my microblaze repo and sending pull request to
> Albert (or Tom now) and there is no problem with that.

WD already answered that part, so I'll skip this.

> Alberts know that and it is working quite well. It is enough to talk to him
> and that's it.
> In socfpga case I think there are guys from Altera who maintain it.

That's not quite the case, that's why I stepped up. Again, WD explained the 
rocketboards situation, but we need to improve on the mainline push and this 
repository should help I hope.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut