From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752030AbaIMPZ3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2014 11:25:29 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:34422 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751927AbaIMPZ1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2014 11:25:27 -0400 Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 08:24:38 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Sedat Dilek , stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Mork , LKML Subject: Re: linux-3.16.y: acpi-battery fixes Message-ID: <20140913152438.GA3072@kroah.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 02:52:52PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I hoped the acpi-fixes from [1] (especially [2]) would fix my shown > "85% battery available", but a Ubuntu/trusty kernel reports the same > (battery defect?). > The 2nd revert is applicable, the 1st not, both are labeled with 3.16+. > > Wanna pick them or have it already on your to-do? > > Thanks. > > Regards, > - Sedat - > > [1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/log/?h=acpi-battery > [2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=acpi-battery&id=508b3c677601797f2d51df3df5caa436dd235cb9 First off, stable kernel questions should go to stable@vger.kernel.org, not just to me. Secondly, I don't understand what you are asking here. What exact fix in Linus's tree do you want to see in a stable backport that I haven't taken already? I've queued up a number of ACPI fixes for 3.16.3, are they not sufficient? thanks, greg k-h