From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/19] drm: Don't update vblank timestamp when the counter didn't change Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:50:05 +0200 Message-ID: <20140915085005.GK4740@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <1407325803-6944-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> <1407325803-6944-15-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> <54147012.40609@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54147012.40609@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Mario Kleiner Cc: Daniel Vetter , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Dave Airlie List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 06:25:54PM +0200, Mario Kleiner wrote: > The current drm-next misses Ville's original Patch 14/19, the one i first > objected, then objected to my objection. It is needed to avoid actual > regressions. Attached a trivially rebased (v2) of Ville's patch to go on top > of drm-next, also as tgz in case my e-mail client mangles the patch again, > because it's one of those "email hates me" weeks. Oh dear, I've made a decent mess of all of this really. Picked up to make sure it doesn't get lost again. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch