From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754602AbaIPP5s (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:57:48 -0400 Received: from gw-1.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.217]:59028 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754334AbaIPP5r (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:57:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:57:38 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Daniel Thompson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, patches@linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, John Stultz , Thomas Gleixner , Sumit Semwal , Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.17-rc4 v6 2/6] arm: fiq: Replace default FIQ handler Message-ID: <20140916155738.GI12361@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1410695835-10496-1-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org> <1410695835-10496-3-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org> <54176F7C.6030908@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54176F7C.6030908@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:00:12AM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On 14/09/14 12:57, Daniel Thompson wrote: > > This patch introduces a new default FIQ handler that is structured in a > > similar way to the existing ARM exception handler and result in the FIQ > > being handled by C code running on the SVC stack (despite this code run > > in the FIQ handler is subject to severe limitations with respect to > > locking making normal interaction with the kernel impossible). > > > > This default handler allows concepts that on x86 would be handled using > > NMIs to be realized on ARM. > > > > Credit: > > > > This patch is a near complete re-write of a patch originally > > provided by Anton Vorontsov. Today only a couple of small fragments > > survive, however without Anton's work to build from this patch would > > not exist. Thanks also to Russell King for spoonfeeding me a variety > > of fixes during the review cycle. > > I've send this patch to the your patch tracker as complete respin (#8150/2). > > If you'd rather handle it as a follow on patch please let me know and I > will prepare it as one. Thanks, as you will see, I've merged this patch, along with my two patches, one removing do_unexp_fiq() and the newline removal in show_regs(). They should be appearing in a linux-next rsn. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:57:38 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3.17-rc4 v6 2/6] arm: fiq: Replace default FIQ handler In-Reply-To: <54176F7C.6030908@linaro.org> References: <1410695835-10496-1-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org> <1410695835-10496-3-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org> <54176F7C.6030908@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20140916155738.GI12361@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:00:12AM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On 14/09/14 12:57, Daniel Thompson wrote: > > This patch introduces a new default FIQ handler that is structured in a > > similar way to the existing ARM exception handler and result in the FIQ > > being handled by C code running on the SVC stack (despite this code run > > in the FIQ handler is subject to severe limitations with respect to > > locking making normal interaction with the kernel impossible). > > > > This default handler allows concepts that on x86 would be handled using > > NMIs to be realized on ARM. > > > > Credit: > > > > This patch is a near complete re-write of a patch originally > > provided by Anton Vorontsov. Today only a couple of small fragments > > survive, however without Anton's work to build from this patch would > > not exist. Thanks also to Russell King for spoonfeeding me a variety > > of fixes during the review cycle. > > I've send this patch to the your patch tracker as complete respin (#8150/2). > > If you'd rather handle it as a follow on patch please let me know and I > will prepare it as one. Thanks, as you will see, I've merged this patch, along with my two patches, one removing do_unexp_fiq() and the newline removal in show_regs(). They should be appearing in a linux-next rsn. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.