From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sowmini Varadhan Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 net-next 0/3] sunvnet: add jumbo frames support Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:33:24 -0400 Message-ID: <20140917223324.GK26828@oracle.com> References: <5419F3DC.60104@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David L Stevens Return-path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:50519 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757332AbaIQWda (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:33:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5419F3DC.60104@oracle.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > arch/sparc/include/asm/vio.h | 44 ++++++++++- > arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c | 2 +- > arch/sparc/kernel/viohs.c | 14 +++- > drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.c | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.h | 7 ++- > 5 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > A logistical question- this patch-set spans both sparc-next/sparclinux net-next/netdev, and there are obviously some dependancies here. What's the prescribed way to handle this sort of thing? (I ask, because I expect to soon be confronting a similar question with some Rx side latency improvements that I'm working on, which will require new functions for enabling/disabling interrupts in arch/sparc/kernel, and I am wondering how that should get sequenced). --Sowmini