From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756913AbaIQXDe (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:03:34 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:60817 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756526AbaIQXDd (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:03:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 01:03:25 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Morten Rasmussen Cc: Nicolas Pitre , Vincent Guittot , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel , Preeti U Murthy , Russell King - ARM Linux , LAK , Rik van Riel , Mike Galbraith , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , Daniel Lezcano , Dietmar Eggemann Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/12] sched: replace capacity_factor by utilization Message-ID: <20140917230325.GI2848@worktop.localdomain> References: <1409051215-16788-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <1409051215-16788-12-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20140911161517.GA3190@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com> <20140914194156.GC2832@worktop.localdomain> <20140915114229.GB3037@worktop.localdomain> <20140915200159.GE2840@worktop.localdomain> <20140917184527.GB9854@e103034-lin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140917184527.GB9854@e103034-lin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 07:45:27PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote: > Right. You don't need to scale capacity to determine whether a cpu is > full or not if you don't have DVFS, but I don't think it hurts if it is > done right. We need the scaling to figure out how much capacity is > available. Maybe I'm particularly dense, but I'm not seeing how the proposed thing is 'right' in any way. There are no words on what specifically is addressed and how it is achieved. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 01:03:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v5 11/12] sched: replace capacity_factor by utilization In-Reply-To: <20140917184527.GB9854@e103034-lin> References: <1409051215-16788-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <1409051215-16788-12-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20140911161517.GA3190@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com> <20140914194156.GC2832@worktop.localdomain> <20140915114229.GB3037@worktop.localdomain> <20140915200159.GE2840@worktop.localdomain> <20140917184527.GB9854@e103034-lin> Message-ID: <20140917230325.GI2848@worktop.localdomain> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 07:45:27PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote: > Right. You don't need to scale capacity to determine whether a cpu is > full or not if you don't have DVFS, but I don't think it hurts if it is > done right. We need the scaling to figure out how much capacity is > available. Maybe I'm particularly dense, but I'm not seeing how the proposed thing is 'right' in any way. There are no words on what specifically is addressed and how it is achieved.