From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/19] drm: Don't update vblank timestamp when the counter didn't change
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:51:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140923135127.GF15734@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r3z25wpy.fsf@intel.com>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:48:25PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 06:25:54PM +0200, Mario Kleiner wrote:
> >> The current drm-next misses Ville's original Patch 14/19, the one i first
> >> objected, then objected to my objection. It is needed to avoid actual
> >> regressions. Attached a trivially rebased (v2) of Ville's patch to go on top
> >> of drm-next, also as tgz in case my e-mail client mangles the patch again,
> >> because it's one of those "email hates me" weeks.
> >
> > Oh dear, I've made a decent mess of all of this really. Picked up to make
> > sure it doesn't get lost again.
>
> After all this nice ping pong our QA has reported a bisected regression
> on this commit: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84161
Looks like a minuscule timing change which resulted in us detecting a fifo
underrun. Or at least I don't see any other related information that would
indicate otherwise ...
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-23 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-06 11:49 [PATCH v2 00/19] drm: More vblank on/off work ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] drm: Always reject drm_vblank_get() after drm_vblank_off() ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] drm/i915: Warn if drm_vblank_get() still works " ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 03/19] drm: Don't clear vblank timestamps when vblank interrupt is disabled ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 04/19] drm: Move drm_update_vblank_count() ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 05/19] drm: Have the vblank counter account for the time between vblank irq disable and drm_vblank_off() ville.syrjala
2014-09-02 19:33 ` Mario Kleiner
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 06/19] drm: Avoid random vblank counter jumps if the hardware counter has been reset ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] drm: Reduce the amount of dev->vblank[crtc] in the code ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 08/19] drm: Fix deadlock between event_lock and vbl_lock/vblank_time_lock ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 09/19] drm: Fix race between drm_vblank_off() and drm_queue_vblank_event() ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 13:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-06 13:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] drm: Disable vblank interrupt immediately when drm_vblank_offdelay<0 ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] drm: Add dev->vblank_disable_immediate flag ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 12/19] drm/i915: Opt out of vblank disable timer on >gen2 ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] drm: Kick start vblank interrupts at drm_vblank_on() ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 14/19] drm: Don't update vblank timestamp when the counter didn't change ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 12:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-06 13:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-09-04 12:14 ` Mario Kleiner
2014-09-13 16:25 ` Mario Kleiner
2014-09-15 8:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-09-23 12:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2014-09-23 13:51 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2014-09-23 14:15 ` Mario Kleiner
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 15/19] drm: Update vblank->last in drm_update_vblank_count() ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 13:08 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2014-08-06 13:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-08-06 14:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 16/19] drm: Store the vblank timestamp when adjusting the counter during disable ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 13:12 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2014-08-06 11:50 ` [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915: Clear .last vblank count before drm_vblank_off() when sanitizing crtc state ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 13:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2014-08-06 13:43 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-08-06 11:50 ` [PATCH 18/19] drm/i915: Update scanline_offset only for active crtcs ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:50 ` [PATCH 19/19] drm: Fix confusing debug message in drm_update_vblank_count() ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:50 ` [PATCH igt] tests/kms_flip: Assert that vblank timestamps aren't zeroed ville.syrjala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140923135127.GF15734@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.