From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:18:13 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mikhail Efremov , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Miklos Szeredi , linux-fsdevel , stable Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vfs: Don't exchange "short" filenames unconditionally. Message-ID: <20140924201813.GI7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1411582473-29184-1-git-send-email-sem@altlinux.org> <20140924185521.GC7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:20:38PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Al Viro wrote: > > > > Yecchhhh... Applied, but it's very ugly. Oh, well - regression is > > regression, and I don't see a cleaner fix at the moment. If I don't > > manage to come up with anything prettier, to Linus it goes in tonight > > pull request ;-/ > > Please don't. That thing is too ugly to exist. It also looks > completely and utterly buggy. There's no way I'm taking it. If > switch-names is suddenly conditional, what the f*ck happens to the > name hash which is unconditionally done with a swap() right > afterwards. The sucker's unhashed after that... And yes, I agree that it's fucking ugly. Still looking for saner ways to do that...