From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: Discussion on whether to continue with the patches for Xen 4.5 Re: [v6][PATCH 2/2] xen:vtd: missing RMRR mapping while share EPT Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:14:05 -0400 Message-ID: <20140929161405.GB32528@laptop.dumpdata.com> References: <542017E80200007800036D1E@mail.emea.novell.com> <5420D357.1060202@intel.com> <5422A08C020000780003814F@mail.emea.novell.com> <5423E98E0200007800038C27@mail.emea.novell.com> <20140925141215.GC20089@laptop.dumpdata.com> <54244D7402000078000390F2@mail.emea.novell.com> <20140926135529.GG30097@laptop.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "Zhang, Yang Z" Cc: "Chen, Tiejun" , "Tian, Kevin" , "paul.durrant@citrix.com" , Jan Beulich , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > Qemu-traditional + Xen 4.5 + RMRR patchset will work. > > > all of those patches be tested/reviewed/posted by Oct 13th? > > > > As in, is this patchset the last piece of the puzzle? > > > > And by tested I mean with the passthrough and without, and > > with various size guests doing migrations (without devices) > > multiple times (say ten) - and 32 or 64 bit. The QA matrix > > means at least 8 variations (32/64 - with PCIe passthrough, > > and without, 2GB or 8GB or 12GB) by my reckoning. > > I am not sure whether we can catch Oct 13th. Does this means those patch will not be accepted by you if we cannot catch Oct 13th? Before today I would have said no - as I think the rework of these patches, the addition of a new hypervisor, review, etc in four days would be highly unlikely - and that meant you would be so busy working towards a deadline and very likely missing it. But we are slipping the schedule due to another issue so the RC0 will move from October 15th to October 25th. That means you will have some breathing room to work this out. So lets see those patches and then evaluate them case-by-case basis. Naturally before even I can give an exception on them - they have to be OK with the maintainers. And tested quite extensively. > > > > > Sorry for being so aggressive about the testing part but I am > > very adverse to regressions - as they have bit me in the past > > and left me with an strong aversion to them. > > > Best regards, > Yang > >