Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: add driver for Ricoh RN5T618 watchdog

[Beniamino Galvani <b.galvani@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:24:11PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Beniamino Galvani wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:58:45AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > I'm not sure why a) this patch was sent to me in the first place and
> > > b) why anyone would think this should go in through MFD?
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi Lee,
> > 
> > from a previous mail [1] I (wrongly) assumed that this was going
> > through the MFD tree. If this is not the case, Wim, can you pick the
> > patch?
> > 
> > Beniamino
> > 
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/4/124
> 
> Okay, I see what's happened.
> 
> So actually if there are interdependencies between this and the other
> patches in the set, which I think there are, then you should have kept
> this in the set with the others.  Sending as an independent patch is
> not the correct thing to do.
> 
> Can you resend this, as a patch-set with all of the Acks you have
> acquired please.  I will then take the set as a whole.

The original series had 4 patches:

- MFD core support
- regulator driver
- watchdog driver
- dts documentation

As explained in the submission comment, all patches except watchdog
one have already been applied (1 and 4 to MFD tree, 2 to
regulator). Only the watchdog support is missing and it doesn't have
compilation dependencies to other patches (the watchdog driver can't
be enabled without the MFD core support).

Do you want me to resend the entire patchset or should this go in
through watchdog?

Beniamino