From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754274AbaI2RAg (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:00:36 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:38897 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751913AbaI2RAd (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:00:33 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:59:37 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Philipp Zabel Cc: Dan Carpenter , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Laurent Pinchart , kernel@pengutronix.de, Grant Likely , Russell King , Guennadi Liakhovetski , linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] [media] soc_camera: Do not decrement endpoint node refcount in the loop Message-ID: <20140929165937.GB13163@kroah.com> References: <1411978551-30480-1-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de> <1411978551-30480-2-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de> <20140929091316.GA23154@mwanda> <1411983923.3050.1.camel@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1411983923.3050.1.camel@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:45:23AM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Am Montag, den 29.09.2014, 12:13 +0300 schrieb Dan Carpenter: > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:15:44AM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > > In preparation for a following patch, stop decrementing the endpoint node > > > refcount in the loop. This temporarily leaks a reference to the endpoint node, > > > which will be fixed by having of_graph_get_next_endpoint decrement the refcount > > > of its prev argument instead. > > > > Don't do this... > > > > My understanding (and I haven't invested much time into trying to > > understand this beyond glancing at the change) is that patch 1 and 2, > > introduce small bugs that are fixed in patch 3? > > > > Just fold all three patches into one patch. We need an Ack from Mauro > > and Greg and then send the patch through Grant's tree. > > Yes. Patches 1 and 2 leak a reference on of_nodes touched by the loop. > As far as I am aware, all users of this code don't use the reference > counting (CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC is disabled), so this bug should be > theoretical. > > I'd be happy do as you suggest if Mauro and Greg agree. Let's see the correct patch, don't break things and then later on fix them... thanks, greg k-h