From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Hall Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix build issues with CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_COMBINE_LIBS=y Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:13:07 -0700 Message-ID: <20141003181307.GB1741@mhcomputing.net> References: <1412265386-26291-1-git-send-email-sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com> <2041475.WSUx3LgNfR@xps13> <20141003081019.GA28988@sivswdev02.ir.intel.com> <2274825.SfVmqUQfpO@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2274825.SfVmqUQfpO@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 10:27:30AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > The proposal is to always build single (combined) lib AND to build separated > libs in case of shared libraries. > For static library: only one single (combined) static library. In the static case, this won't be backward compatible for people with existing linking, and won't allow people to pick which PMD's to activate without recompiling DPDK. If you're OK with that then I don't have an issue. But some others may not like it. Matthew.