From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755778AbaJXJLu (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:11:50 -0400 Received: from foss-mx-na.foss.arm.com ([217.140.108.86]:47933 "EHLO foss-mx-na.foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752682AbaJXJLs (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:11:48 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:11:38 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Matteo Franchin , Davidlohr Bueso , Linus Torvalds , Darren Hart , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: Mention key referencing differences between shared and private futexes Message-ID: <20141024091137.GB20534@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1413563929-2664-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> <1414121220.817.0.camel@linux-t7sj.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1414121220.817.0.camel@linux-t7sj.site> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:27:00AM +0100, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > From: Davidlohr Bueso > > Update our documentation as of fix 76835b0ebf8 (futex: Ensure > get_futex_key_refs() always implies a barrier). Explicitly > state that we don't do key referencing for private futexes. > > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso Looks fine to me. Acked-by: Catalin Marinas Thanks.