From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934726AbaJ3RP3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:15:29 -0400 Received: from foss-mx-na.foss.arm.com ([217.140.108.86]:51102 "EHLO foss-mx-na.foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933054AbaJ3RP2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:15:28 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:15:22 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: Mark Rutland Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Catalin Marinas , "ghackmann@google.com" , "ijc@hellion.org.uk" , Serban Constantinescu , "cross-distro@lists.linaro.org" , "linux-api@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] arm64: Fix up /proc/cpuinfo Message-ID: <20141030171521.GL32589@arm.com> References: <1414159000-27059-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <1414159000-27059-2-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1414159000-27059-2-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark, On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 02:56:40PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > Commit d7a49086f263164a (arm64: cpuinfo: print info for all CPUs) > attempted to clean up /proc/cpuinfo, but due to concerns regarding > further changes was reverted in commit 5e39977edf6500fd (Revert "arm64: > cpuinfo: print info for all CPUs"). I've applied this on our devel branch, with a view to queuing it for -next in a week or two. I think we should also CC stable on this, so could you see how far back it applies please? (note that I already had to resolve a conflict with a patch we've got queued from Ard). Cheers, Will From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] arm64: Fix up /proc/cpuinfo Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:15:22 +0000 Message-ID: <20141030171521.GL32589@arm.com> References: <1414159000-27059-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <1414159000-27059-2-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1414159000-27059-2-git-send-email-mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mark Rutland Cc: "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , Catalin Marinas , "ghackmann-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , "ijc-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org" , Serban Constantinescu , "cross-distro-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org" , "linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark, On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 02:56:40PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > Commit d7a49086f263164a (arm64: cpuinfo: print info for all CPUs) > attempted to clean up /proc/cpuinfo, but due to concerns regarding > further changes was reverted in commit 5e39977edf6500fd (Revert "arm64: > cpuinfo: print info for all CPUs"). I've applied this on our devel branch, with a view to queuing it for -next in a week or two. I think we should also CC stable on this, so could you see how far back it applies please? (note that I already had to resolve a conflict with a patch we've got queued from Ard). Cheers, Will From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:15:22 +0000 Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/1] arm64: Fix up /proc/cpuinfo In-Reply-To: <1414159000-27059-2-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> References: <1414159000-27059-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <1414159000-27059-2-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> Message-ID: <20141030171521.GL32589@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Mark, On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 02:56:40PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > Commit d7a49086f263164a (arm64: cpuinfo: print info for all CPUs) > attempted to clean up /proc/cpuinfo, but due to concerns regarding > further changes was reverted in commit 5e39977edf6500fd (Revert "arm64: > cpuinfo: print info for all CPUs"). I've applied this on our devel branch, with a view to queuing it for -next in a week or two. I think we should also CC stable on this, so could you see how far back it applies please? (note that I already had to resolve a conflict with a patch we've got queued from Ard). Cheers, Will