All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] x86, microcode, intel: defend apply_microcode_intel with BUG_ON
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 20:56:39 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141107225639.GD18128@khazad-dum.debian.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141107200501.GF5180@pd.tnic>

On Fri, 07 Nov 2014, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 02:37:54PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Microcode updates that requires an unknown loader should never reach the
> > apply_* functions (the code should have rejected it earlier).  Likewise
> > for an unknown microcode header layout.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c       |    2 ++
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_early.c |    2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> > index 40caef1..439681f 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> > @@ -157,6 +157,8 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
> >  	if (mc_intel == NULL)
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> > +	BUG_ON(mc_intel->hdr.hdrver != 1 || mc_intel->hdr.ldrver != 1);
> > +
> >  	/* Intel SDM vol 3A section 9.11.6, page 9-34 */
> >  	if (WARN_ONCE((unsigned long)(mc_intel->bits) % 16,
> >  		"microcode data incorrectly aligned"))
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_early.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_early.c
> > index 994c59b..095db11 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_early.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_early.c
> > @@ -671,6 +671,8 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct mc_saved_data *mc_saved_data,
> >  	if (mc_intel == NULL)
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> > +	BUG_ON(mc_intel->hdr.hdrver != 1 || mc_intel->hdr.ldrver != 1);
> > +
> >  	mcu_data = mc_intel->bits;
> >  	aligned_mcu_data = mc_intel->bits;
> 
> Both not needed, because we're running all microcode through
> microcode_sanity_check() first which already does that check.

Yeah, that's why it is BUG_ON().

But if you feel this is too defensive, I will just drop this patch.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-07 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-08 17:37 [PATCH 0/8] x86, microcode, intel: fixes and enhancements Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86, microcode, intel: forbid some incorrect metadata Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-05 17:34   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-05 19:37     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-05 21:13       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-05 21:49         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-06  5:15           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86, microcode, intel: don't update each HT core twice Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-20 13:32   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-20 18:24     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-28 17:31       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-31 18:43         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-01 11:06           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-01 19:20             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-04 15:53               ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86, microcode, intel: clarify log messages Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-20 13:52   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-21 14:13     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-29  9:54       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-31 20:08         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-07 17:37           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86, microcode, intel: add error logging to early update driver Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-20 15:08   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-21 14:10     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-30 17:41       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-30 18:15         ` Joe Perches
2014-10-31 20:10         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86, microcode, intel: don't check extsig entry checksum Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-30 20:25   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-31 17:14     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-07 17:49       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86, microcode, intel: use cpuid explicitly instead of sync_core Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-07 17:56   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-07 18:40     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-07 19:48       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86, microcode, intel: guard against misaligned microcode data Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-18  0:48   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-07 19:59   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-07 22:54     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-07 23:48       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-08 21:57         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-11 10:47           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-11 16:57             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-11 17:13               ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-11 19:54                 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-12 12:31                   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-13  0:18                     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-13 11:53                       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-15 23:10                         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-24 17:35                           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-25 13:29                             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86, microcode, intel: defend apply_microcode_intel with BUG_ON Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-07 20:05   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-07 22:56     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [this message]
2014-11-07 23:48       ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141107225639.GD18128@khazad-dum.debian.net \
    --to=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.