On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 03:33:38AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:

> > I think that what Morimoto-san wanted to say was something like this:

> >   I guess that removing the "ak" line from vendor-prefixes.txt would
> >   be sufficient to cause checkpatch to generate a warning about
> >   using the deprecated "ak" vendor prefix. Is that a good approach?

> Yes, this is.
> Thank you Simon, Sorry Joe.

It'd be a bit nicer to be able to leave it there with a note saying it
was legacy (if only so people don't try to add it back) but I don't mind
too much.