From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" The branch tracer should not be checking the trace_seq_printf() return value as that will soon be void. There's a new trace_handle_return() helper function that will return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE if the trace_seq overflowed and TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED otherwise. Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt --- kernel/trace/trace_branch.c | 15 +++++++-------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_branch.c b/kernel/trace/trace_branch.c index a3916f68a1c7..7d6e2afde669 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_branch.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_branch.c @@ -151,14 +151,13 @@ static enum print_line_t trace_branch_print(struct trace_iterator *iter, trace_assign_type(field, iter->ent); - if (trace_seq_printf(&iter->seq, "[%s] %s:%s:%d\n", - field->correct ? " ok " : " MISS ", - field->func, - field->file, - field->line)) - return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE; - - return TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED; + trace_seq_printf(&iter->seq, "[%s] %s:%s:%d\n", + field->correct ? " ok " : " MISS ", + field->func, + field->file, + field->line); + + return trace_handle_return(&iter->seq); } static void branch_print_header(struct seq_file *s) -- 2.1.1