From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752735AbaKUW1N (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Nov 2014 17:27:13 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:39821 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751545AbaKUW1J (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Nov 2014 17:27:09 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 17:27:05 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20141121.172705.540279259389643572.davem@davemloft.net> To: elfring@users.sourceforge.net Cc: haiyangz@microsoft.com, kys@microsoft.com, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, julia.lawall@lip6.fr Subject: Re: net: Hyper-V: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "vfree" From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <546FB98E.5070703@users.sourceforge.net> References: <546DF9D7.6080801@users.sourceforge.net> <20141121.151503.1986113223309494197.davem@davemloft.net> <546FB98E.5070703@users.sourceforge.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.7 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:27:08 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 23:15:42 +0100 >> This does not apply to the net-next tree, please respin. > > Thanks for your reply. > > How do you think about to try out the scripts which I published > in March to get more constructive feedback? This has nothing to do with me asking you to frame your patches against the correct tree. If I had time to investigate automation of changes using such tools, I would participate in such discussions, but I don't. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: net: Hyper-V: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "vfree" Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 17:27:05 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20141121.172705.540279259389643572.davem@davemloft.net> References: <546DF9D7.6080801@users.sourceforge.net> <20141121.151503.1986113223309494197.davem@davemloft.net> <546FB98E.5070703@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, haiyangz@microsoft.com, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, julia.lawall@lip6.fr, devel@linuxdriverproject.org To: elfring@users.sourceforge.net Return-path: In-Reply-To: <546FB98E.5070703@users.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: "devel" List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 23:15:42 +0100 >> This does not apply to the net-next tree, please respin. > > Thanks for your reply. > > How do you think about to try out the scripts which I published > in March to get more constructive feedback? This has nothing to do with me asking you to frame your patches against the correct tree. If I had time to investigate automation of changes using such tools, I would participate in such discussions, but I don't. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 22:27:05 +0000 Subject: Re: net: Hyper-V: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "vfree" Message-Id: <20141121.172705.540279259389643572.davem@davemloft.net> List-Id: References: <546DF9D7.6080801@users.sourceforge.net> <20141121.151503.1986113223309494197.davem@davemloft.net> <546FB98E.5070703@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <546FB98E.5070703@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: elfring@users.sourceforge.net Cc: haiyangz@microsoft.com, kys@microsoft.com, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, julia.lawall@lip6.fr From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 23:15:42 +0100 >> This does not apply to the net-next tree, please respin. > > Thanks for your reply. > > How do you think about to try out the scripts which I published > in March to get more constructive feedback? This has nothing to do with me asking you to frame your patches against the correct tree. If I had time to investigate automation of changes using such tools, I would participate in such discussions, but I don't.