From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: xl pci-attach silently fails the first time Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 09:36:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20141203083628.GA11508@aepfle.de> References: <20141201125712.GA21576@aepfle.de> <20141201133244.GA24600@aepfle.de> <20141201170151.GK3180@laptop.dumpdata.com> <20141202154652.GA26732@aepfle.de> <20141202183920.GG32385@laptop.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141202183920.GG32385@laptop.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Dec 02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:46:52PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 01, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > > > That is odd - I see any device 'hot-plugged' being added at 00:05 and further. > > > > Does this by any chance depend on the guest?! I mean, how is the guest > > I doubt it. Something is different here, likely just the non-pvops guest kernel. > > notified that a PCI device is gone (by unplug)? Maybe the pvops case > > just happens to work because the unplug happens early, perhaps before > > PCI discovery?! > > ACPI hotplug. And it does work after PCI discovery. In a pvops kernel, is the emulated but unplugged PCI hardware still listed with lspci? Olaf