From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49916) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwT75-0000Ot-DM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 04:54:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwT70-0007A3-PV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 04:54:19 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55891) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwT70-00079s-Hb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 04:54:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:53:49 +0000 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Message-ID: <20141204095349.GB16269@redhat.com> References: <1417589746-12176-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> <20141203093807.GA10160@redhat.com> <547EDD01.7050608@huawei.com> <1417608638.14168.49.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <547FC7C8.6050304@huawei.com> <1417682821.14168.128.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <54802D6E.4080704@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54802D6E.4080704@huawei.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] Support to change VNC keyboard layout dynamically Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gonglei Cc: "Huangpeng (Peter)" , "lcapitulino@redhat.com" , "Huangweidong (C)" , Gerd Hoffmann , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 05:46:22PM +0800, Gonglei wrote: > On 2014/12/4 16:47, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > > Hi, > > > >> Hum.. Now, I encountered this situation that the common clienteles just use > >> tightvnc client, but want to change keymap dynamically. As you say, > >> the only way address this scenario is doing it on the server side. So, > >> do you think this patch series make sense and consider to accept it > >> in upstream? Thanks! > > > > The alternatives are: > > > > * Try figure why they are using tightvnc. Do they simply don't know > > there are other vnc clients such as remote-viewer with much better > > keyboard support? Did they try other clients and want stick to > > tightvnc nevertheless? If so, what are the reasons? > > > > As far as I can tell, they integrate tightvnc into a web page (tightvnc > realized by Java) as a jar file in Desktop Cloud scenario on windows guests. > I don't know virt-viewing/remote-viewer whether work well on windows > platform? We do now provide Windows builds of viewer-viewer + remote-viewer in a single MSI installer for Win 32 & 64 bit http://virt-manager.org/download/ Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|