From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 25/25] crypto: ansi_cprng - If non-deterministic, don't buffer old output Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:22:40 -0500 Message-ID: <20141208142239.GA3237@localhost.localdomain> References: <6f29805d8bbde1af112d48201d5fde9a7776027f.1417951990.git.linux@horizon.com> <20141207224959.25453.qmail@ns.horizon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, smueller@chronox.de To: George Spelvin Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:60455 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755386AbaLHOXD (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:23:03 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141207224959.25453.qmail@ns.horizon.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 05:49:59PM -0500, George Spelvin wrote: > By the way, this patch includes a bug due to a last minute "oh, I can > make that more efficient!" which I realized after a night's sleep. > (The v1 patch worked, FWIW.) > > Anyway, it's an RFC; I'm not even sure if I want this personally, > but it's a bit of extra paranoia to always genreate fresh seed per > read. Wait, I'm confused. You mention in this note that this is an RFC patch, but not anywhere else in the series. Are you proposing this for inclusion or not? Neil > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >