From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7 v3] tools/hotplug: systemd changes for 4.5 Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 09:06:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20141222080639.GA6139@aepfle.de> References: <1418988333-5404-1-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de> <20141219191032.GB9213@laptop.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141219191032.GB9213@laptop.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: m.a.young@durham.ac.uk, xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Dec 19, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:25:26PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > > This is a resend of these two series: > > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg00858.html > > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg00669.html > > > > New in v3 is a wrapper to run xenstored. See its patch description > > for details. > > > > Patch 2-6 should be applied for 4.5.0. > > > > The first and the last one still has issues with xenstored and > > SELinux. See below. Up to now no solution is known to me. > > > > > > The first patch fixes Arch Linux and does not break anything. As such > > it should be safe to be applied for 4.5.0. SELinux users (who build > > from source) should put their special mount options into fstab. Distro > > Could you elaborate what that is? As in what is that 'special mount options'? The context= mount option, about which we argue since a few weeks? See patch #1. > > packages will most likely include a proper .service file. > > > > > > The last patch addresses the XENSTORED_TRACE issue. But SELinux will > > most likely still not work. > > > > Possible ways to handle launching xenstored and SELinux: > > > > - do nothing > > pro: - no Xen source changes required > > con: - possible unhappy users who build from source and still have > > SELinux enabled > > At this stage I prefer this and just have in the release notes the > work-around documented. Which workaround is that? No SELinux on Fedora? Olaf