From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Y72VQ-0000Bu-4t for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2015 13:43:08 +0000 Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 08:42:40 -0500 From: Vivek Goyal Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kdump, vmcoreinfo: report actual value of phys_base Message-ID: <20150102134240.GD18785@redhat.com> References: <20141113.113011.630216167285231824.d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com> <20141215151120.b44112413e15a8c390d39147@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141215151120.b44112413e15a8c390d39147@linux-foundation.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp, HATAYAMA Daisuke , kexec@lists.infradead.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, anderson@redhat.com On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 03:11:20PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > (cc trimmed a bit) > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:30:11 +0900 (JST) HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: > > > Currently, VMCOREINFO note information reports the virtual address of > > phys_base that is assigned to symbol phys_base. But this doesn't make > > sense because to refer to phys_base, it's necessary to get the value > > of phys_base itself we are now about to refer to. > > Folks, could we please get a bit of reviewing, acking or nacking for > this one? To me this patch is more like a hack or a quick fix to get dump filtering working when dump is generated using virsh-dump like tools. I feel there should be discussion on what's the proper way to do this. I don't have very specific ideas though at this point of time. Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec