From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754048AbbAENCI (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2015 08:02:08 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:50278 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753246AbbAENCF (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2015 08:02:05 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 14:01:41 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Pawel Moll Cc: Ingo Molnar , Richard Cochran , Steven Rostedt , Paul Mackerras , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , John Stultz , Masami Hiramatsu , Christopher Covington , Namhyung Kim , David Ahern , Thomas Gleixner , Tomeu Vizoso , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-api@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] perf: Use monotonic clock as a source for timestamps Message-ID: <20150105130141.GQ30905@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1415292718-19785-1-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com> <1415292718-19785-2-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com> <1417100750.4371.1.camel@arm.com> <1418305153.4037.1.camel@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1418305153.4037.1.camel@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 01:39:13PM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote: > On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 15:05 +0000, Pawel Moll wrote: > > It's been 3 weeks without any negative feedback (no feedback at all, but > > I take the optimistic view :-)... > > > > How about queuing at least this patch alone for the incoming merge > > window? Or at least getting it into -next, with the view at 3.20? > > It's been another two weeks... How about getting it queued for v3.20 > then? Yes sorry about that, I had me a kid and took a wee bit of time away from computers, then xmas and new years happened. In any case, best wishes for the new year to all. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] perf: Use monotonic clock as a source for timestamps Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 14:01:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20150105130141.GQ30905@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1415292718-19785-1-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com> <1415292718-19785-2-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com> <1417100750.4371.1.camel@arm.com> <1418305153.4037.1.camel@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1418305153.4037.1.camel-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Pawel Moll Cc: Ingo Molnar , Richard Cochran , Steven Rostedt , Paul Mackerras , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , John Stultz , Masami Hiramatsu , Christopher Covington , Namhyung Kim , David Ahern , Thomas Gleixner , Tomeu Vizoso , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 01:39:13PM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote: > On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 15:05 +0000, Pawel Moll wrote: > > It's been 3 weeks without any negative feedback (no feedback at all, but > > I take the optimistic view :-)... > > > > How about queuing at least this patch alone for the incoming merge > > window? Or at least getting it into -next, with the view at 3.20? > > It's been another two weeks... How about getting it queued for v3.20 > then? Yes sorry about that, I had me a kid and took a wee bit of time away from computers, then xmas and new years happened. In any case, best wishes for the new year to all.