On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 01:10:14PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Ajay,
> 
> On 17 December 2014 at 09:31, Javier Martinez Canillas <
> javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> > On 12/16/2014 12:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >> You asked Ajay to change his series to use the video port and enpoints
> > DT
> > >> bindings instead of phandles, could you please review his latest
> > version?
> > >>
> > >> I guess is now too late for 3.19 since we are in the middle of the merge
> > >> window but it would be great if this series can at least made it to
> > 3.20.
> > >
> > > I don't have time to review the series in details right now, but I'm
> > happy
> > > with the DT bindings, and have no big issue with the rest of the
> > patches. I
> > > don't really like the of_drm_find_bridge() concept introduced in 03/14
> > but I
> > > won't nack it given lack of time to implement an alternative proposal.
> > It's an
> > > internal API, it can always be reworked later anyway.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for taking the time to look at the DT bindings, then I guess
> > that the series are finally ready to be merged?
> >
> > Ajay's series don't apply cleanly anymore because it has been a while since
> > he posted it but he can rebase on top of 3.19-rc1 once it is released and
> > re-resend.
> >
> 
> Do you have any plans to rebase this so it's ready for merging?
> 
> Thierry, Daniel, Dave - whose tree would this be best to merge through?

The plan is for me to take the bridge patches through the drm/panel
tree. I'm going to look at these patches again later this week but from
a very quick peek there don't seem to be any major issues left.

Thierry