From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 00/14] drm/exynos: few patches to enhance bridge chip support Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 14:50:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20150105135015.GA12010@ulmo.nvidia.com> References: <1416045309-13359-1-git-send-email-ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com> <548ABAB6.6010200@collabora.co.uk> <3197445.qizQc0zeRb@avalon> <54914D7D.9060108@collabora.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1981909144==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: Daniel Stone Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Sean Paul , Daniel Vetter , dri-devel , Ajay Kumar , Tomi Valkeinen , Laurent Pinchart , Ajay kumar , Kukjin Kim , Pannaga Bhushan Reddy Patel , Prashanth G , Javier Martinez Canillas , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --===============1981909144== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR" Content-Disposition: inline --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 01:10:14PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi Ajay, >=20 > On 17 December 2014 at 09:31, Javier Martinez Canillas < > javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> wrote: >=20 > > On 12/16/2014 12:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > >> You asked Ajay to change his series to use the video port and enpoin= ts > > DT > > >> bindings instead of phandles, could you please review his latest > > version? > > >> > > >> I guess is now too late for 3.19 since we are in the middle of the m= erge > > >> window but it would be great if this series can at least made it to > > 3.20. > > > > > > I don't have time to review the series in details right now, but I'm > > happy > > > with the DT bindings, and have no big issue with the rest of the > > patches. I > > > don't really like the of_drm_find_bridge() concept introduced in 03/14 > > but I > > > won't nack it given lack of time to implement an alternative proposal. > > It's an > > > internal API, it can always be reworked later anyway. > > > > Thanks a lot for taking the time to look at the DT bindings, then I gue= ss > > that the series are finally ready to be merged? > > > > Ajay's series don't apply cleanly anymore because it has been a while s= ince > > he posted it but he can rebase on top of 3.19-rc1 once it is released a= nd > > re-resend. > > >=20 > Do you have any plans to rebase this so it's ready for merging? >=20 > Thierry, Daniel, Dave - whose tree would this be best to merge through? The plan is for me to take the bridge patches through the drm/panel tree. I'm going to look at these patches again later this week but from a very quick peek there don't seem to be any major issues left. Thierry --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUqpaXAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhM0gP/3LQ4ubyf8oC1nAytarOZon5 LTY3O2gTDPx8PKkhCdyy7h99CU/X06eNIDb1tko017peRZbFdMCfJCBZ/DtilvCk DZxt5OWu2wv6Xk5tq8S32tjYT2sKiAmSlcdJEZikLanJFzSWHjCEcAtu379tO2cM 1obhJrFYLBuIIBrDFYPnOOlKu6yXWaAW3cuSp0qGiNayCDkHigbimsIrusLCV5an Ypv6soIUbk+ZiIv7vNkZvVkjc/2mb0AsaWVoXb4wzZxOSEBU/AyiMwKeRQOtdRIL 1Em2/De4SCwDgZVmouaT0xON532AEbn16fUJDjoAnc8JrzruPY6DWnOL5x0OhFTb 8ZNh+oK7u9pT0CL4jzjCQ6BsWmCEP4epapzAKasQYMS6YHHxB5eQ5DJvZvsS7BmN JIpg61FcPLuSyEnOHBi+ZltH2MfbVXiKrbEuJfT+nd7Bakp4rErC+T5j3AXq2QvR FQiqhFY9lean21zCLATx/LtGHj75+riaOEmV2QRx2geWlx8gh8AD01b5AFsl7eZD vIBD0kHgGhIbtSwy+9sZ99MKZP7vGfJQkEbwCqF3s7UCQ3WtWoQ/aLexaxGV8l0e 53ncq7wdzTCcd1n7NJZA1D62hJsWubn214thqJkDSLnmu9hDmzSAaHJco8j+/ZyT 3OlQJD3eyVELEcDcZk7O =trO7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR-- --===============1981909144== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHA6Ly9saXN0 cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9kcmktZGV2ZWwK --===============1981909144==-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thierry.reding@gmail.com (Thierry Reding) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 14:50:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCH V8 00/14] drm/exynos: few patches to enhance bridge chip support In-Reply-To: References: <1416045309-13359-1-git-send-email-ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com> <548ABAB6.6010200@collabora.co.uk> <3197445.qizQc0zeRb@avalon> <54914D7D.9060108@collabora.co.uk> Message-ID: <20150105135015.GA12010@ulmo.nvidia.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 01:10:14PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi Ajay, > > On 17 December 2014 at 09:31, Javier Martinez Canillas < > javier.martinez at collabora.co.uk> wrote: > > > On 12/16/2014 12:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > >> You asked Ajay to change his series to use the video port and enpoints > > DT > > >> bindings instead of phandles, could you please review his latest > > version? > > >> > > >> I guess is now too late for 3.19 since we are in the middle of the merge > > >> window but it would be great if this series can at least made it to > > 3.20. > > > > > > I don't have time to review the series in details right now, but I'm > > happy > > > with the DT bindings, and have no big issue with the rest of the > > patches. I > > > don't really like the of_drm_find_bridge() concept introduced in 03/14 > > but I > > > won't nack it given lack of time to implement an alternative proposal. > > It's an > > > internal API, it can always be reworked later anyway. > > > > Thanks a lot for taking the time to look at the DT bindings, then I guess > > that the series are finally ready to be merged? > > > > Ajay's series don't apply cleanly anymore because it has been a while since > > he posted it but he can rebase on top of 3.19-rc1 once it is released and > > re-resend. > > > > Do you have any plans to rebase this so it's ready for merging? > > Thierry, Daniel, Dave - whose tree would this be best to merge through? The plan is for me to take the bridge patches through the drm/panel tree. I'm going to look at these patches again later this week but from a very quick peek there don't seem to be any major issues left. Thierry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: