From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755632AbbAJWlZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jan 2015 17:41:25 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:41873 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753999AbbAJWlX (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jan 2015 17:41:23 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 23:41:20 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Denys Vlasenko Cc: Linus Torvalds , Denys Vlasenko , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Oleg Nesterov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski , Frederic Weisbecker , X86 ML , Alexei Starovoitov , Will Drewry , Kees Cook Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86: open-code register save/restore in trace_hardirqs thunks Message-ID: <20150110224120.GJ12218@pd.tnic> References: <1420927210-19738-1-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com> <1420927210-19738-4-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:35:58PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > I don't know either... it seems to be used after push_cfi > *sometimes*, not always: > > .macro op_safe_regs op > ENTRY(\op\()_safe_regs) > CFI_STARTPROC > pushl_cfi %ebx > pushl_cfi %ebp > pushl_cfi %esi > pushl_cfi %edi > > but > > ENTRY(csum_partial) > CFI_STARTPROC > pushl_cfi %esi > CFI_REL_OFFSET esi, 0 > pushl_cfi %ebx > CFI_REL_OFFSET ebx, 0 > > We need an expert to enlighten us. I think Andy had it: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUuJ8T%2BLp23uYezHvxAtF-L_20dOaD4aDxciE7xZqDK3w@mail.gmail.com So we better hide that crap in the macro at least, like the rest of the CFI gunk. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --