From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/18] nfsd: pNFS block layout driver Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:43:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20150112124302.GA29681@lst.de> References: <1420561721-9150-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1420561721-9150-15-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20150112045606.GA107426@slacker.internal.excfb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "J. Bruce Fields" , Jeff Layton , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com To: Tom Haynes Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:41051 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751641AbbALMnF (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 07:43:05 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150112045606.GA107426@slacker.internal.excfb.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:56:06PM -0500, Tom Haynes wrote: > Could you follow the client code convention by putting > each layout type in a directory? I have to say I hate that convention on the client side, so I'd be happier to keep it as-is. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0DD7F51 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:43:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB699304039 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:43:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id c8RFlVAWKn6a0QPY (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:43:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:43:02 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/18] nfsd: pNFS block layout driver Message-ID: <20150112124302.GA29681@lst.de> References: <1420561721-9150-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1420561721-9150-15-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20150112045606.GA107426@slacker.internal.excfb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150112045606.GA107426@slacker.internal.excfb.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Tom Haynes Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, "J. Bruce Fields" , Jeff Layton , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:56:06PM -0500, Tom Haynes wrote: > Could you follow the client code convention by putting > each layout type in a directory? I have to say I hate that convention on the client side, so I'd be happier to keep it as-is. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs