From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752837AbbAVQgJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:36:09 -0500 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:45000 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752061AbbAVQgH (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:36:07 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:36:05 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Arnd Bergmann , Boris Brezillon , Bo Shen , Wenyou Yang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/17] ARM: at91: merge SOC_AT91SAM9xxx Message-ID: <20150122163605.GC19922@piout.net> References: <1421359100-8930-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <1421359100-8930-11-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <54C0CF5D.8020902@atmel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <54C0CF5D.8020902@atmel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22/01/2015 at 11:22:21 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote : > Le 15/01/2015 22:58, Alexandre Belloni a écrit : > > Only use SOC_AT91SAM9 for all the at91sam9 SoCs. > > > > It enables HAVE_AT91_SMD and HAVE_AT91_UTMI for all the sam9 SoCs but this only > > represents 96 bytes of uncompressed kernel code. > > After this patch that removes all the CONFIG_SOC_AT91SAM9xxxx options > excepted CONFIG_SOC_AT91SAM9, I still see a lot of them remaining in the > source tree. > > So, this patch is not complete in my opinion. Even if you remove these > options later on, why not suppress them here? > They went through other branches (you were in copy). -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:36:05 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 10/17] ARM: at91: merge SOC_AT91SAM9xxx In-Reply-To: <54C0CF5D.8020902@atmel.com> References: <1421359100-8930-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <1421359100-8930-11-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <54C0CF5D.8020902@atmel.com> Message-ID: <20150122163605.GC19922@piout.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 22/01/2015 at 11:22:21 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote : > Le 15/01/2015 22:58, Alexandre Belloni a ?crit : > > Only use SOC_AT91SAM9 for all the at91sam9 SoCs. > > > > It enables HAVE_AT91_SMD and HAVE_AT91_UTMI for all the sam9 SoCs but this only > > represents 96 bytes of uncompressed kernel code. > > After this patch that removes all the CONFIG_SOC_AT91SAM9xxxx options > excepted CONFIG_SOC_AT91SAM9, I still see a lot of them remaining in the > source tree. > > So, this patch is not complete in my opinion. Even if you remove these > options later on, why not suppress them here? > They went through other branches (you were in copy). -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com