All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86, crash: Allocate enough low-mem when crashkernel=high
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:07:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150126120756.GF30345@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150123084453.GL2461@dhcp-16-105.nay.redhat.com>

Hi Baoquan,

thanks for your reply.

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:44:53PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> 2) increase low-mem when crashkernel=high. But we have to be careful to
> do this. We implement crashkernel=high not only for the unhappiness
> crashkernel reservation is limited below 4G, but dma/dma32 memory space
> is precious on some systems. If set crashkernel=high still too much low
> memory has to be reserved by default, it's important to find the
> balance. So if we have to increase the default low-mem, how much memory
> is enough, why 256M?  why not 128M/192M/320M/384M?  And if 256M works
> on your system, what if another person say it does't work because there
> are more devices on his system?
> 
> Anyway, I understand the requirement, but we need find out how much
> memory can satisfy most of systems.

Yes, I totally agree that it is tough to find a good default here. I
used 256MB because this is what was required on the system the  failed
kdumps were reported on.

But probably we can agree that 72MB is not enough (given that 64MB are
taken away by swiotlb already), and increase it to a value we think by
now is sufficient for most systems.

Btw, the issue was also reported on machines with only a few devices,
the reason there is that device drivers allocate more dma memory by
default on intilization. Maybe we should handle that as a driver
regression in the future, forcing them to allocate more dma-memory
on-demand and not on initialization.


	Joerg


  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-26 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-06 14:51 [PATCH 0/3 v2] Fix kdump failures with crashkernel=high Joerg Roedel
2015-01-06 14:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] swiotlb: Warn on allocation failure in swiotlb_alloc_coherent Joerg Roedel
2015-01-23 17:04   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-01-26 11:49     ` Joerg Roedel
2015-01-06 14:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, swiotlb: Try coherent allocations with __GFP_NOWARN Joerg Roedel
2015-01-23 17:03   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-01-26  3:22     ` Baoquan He
2015-01-26 11:54       ` Joerg Roedel
2015-01-06 14:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86, crash: Allocate enough low-mem when crashkernel=high Joerg Roedel
2015-01-23  8:44   ` Baoquan He
2015-01-26 12:07     ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2015-02-01  8:41       ` Baoquan He
2015-02-04 14:10         ` Joerg Roedel
2015-02-09 12:20           ` Joerg Roedel
2015-02-13 15:34             ` Baoquan He
2015-02-13 22:28               ` Joerg Roedel
2015-02-14 11:44                 ` Baoquan He
2015-01-23 17:02   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-01-26 12:11     ` Joerg Roedel
2015-01-26 12:20       ` Borislav Petkov
2015-01-26 12:40         ` Joerg Roedel
2015-01-26 12:45           ` Borislav Petkov
2015-01-14 13:35 ` [PATCH 0/3 v2] Fix kdump failures with crashkernel=high Joerg Roedel
2015-01-19 19:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-01-19 19:26   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-02-14 10:58 ` Baoquan He
2015-02-14 16:11   ` Joerg Roedel
2015-06-02  8:54     ` Baoquan He
2015-06-02  9:08       ` Joerg Roedel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-06-05 10:29 [PATCH 0/3 v3] " Joerg Roedel
2015-06-05 10:30 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86, crash: Allocate enough low-mem when crashkernel=high Joerg Roedel
2014-11-28 11:29 [PATCH 0/3] Fix kdump failures with crashkernel=high Joerg Roedel
2014-11-28 11:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86, crash: Allocate enough low-mem when crashkernel=high Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150126120756.GF30345@8bytes.org \
    --to=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.