All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Vogt <vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <maasami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 2/3] ftrace: introduce nohotpatch function attribute
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:19:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150127061941.GA4591@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150126093701.699763dc@gandalf.local.home>

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 09:37:01AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:54:53 +0100
> Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> > s390 will use the hotpatch attribute for function tracing, therefore
> > introduce a nohotpatch define, depending on CC_USING_HOTPATCH, and add it
> > to the existing notrace define.
> 
> Are the two mutually exclusive? That is, can you have -pg and hotpatch
> together? Reason why I ask is, if you have either -pg or hotpatch, then
> we only need "no_instrument_function" or "hotpatch" in the notrace
> define, not both. But I could be wrong.

While the kernel may use only profiling or hotpatch at the same
time, Gcc is able to generate both for the same function.

Ciao

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

-- 

Dominik Vogt
IBM Germany


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-01-27  6:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-26 12:54 [PATCH/RFC 0/3] ftrace: allow arch specific compile options Heiko Carstens
2015-01-26 12:54 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/3] ftrace: allow architectures to specify ftrace " Heiko Carstens
2015-01-26 12:54 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/3] ftrace: introduce nohotpatch function attribute Heiko Carstens
2015-01-26 14:37   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-01-26 15:03     ` Heiko Carstens
2015-01-26 15:22       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-01-26 15:26         ` Heiko Carstens
2015-01-27  6:19     ` Dominik Vogt [this message]
2015-01-27 14:42       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-01-28  5:36         ` Heiko Carstens
2015-01-28 11:57           ` Steven Rostedt
2015-01-28 12:18             ` Heiko Carstens
2015-01-28 12:38               ` Steven Rostedt
2015-01-26 12:54 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/3] s390/ftrace: hotpatch support for function tracing Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150127061941.GA4591@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maasami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.