From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jn@hz6.de (Jan Niggemann)
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:25:04 +0100
Subject: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung
In-Reply-To: <1218844080.996910.1422342028538.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
References: <D76104AF467C9F418519BEF4906C06E40F6A5B91@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com>
	<20150127024846.GB3124@kroah.com>
	<D76104AF467C9F418519BEF4906C06E40F6A5BF1@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com>
	<10984.1422331319@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
	<D76104AF467C9F418519BEF4906C06E40F6A5C18@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com>
	<12694.1422333909@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
	<D76104AF467C9F418519BEF4906C06E40F6A5C87@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com>
	<1218844080.996910.1422342028538.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <20150127092504.Horde.GN7WZoEMVM4x4ojufjVTpA3@htjn.suhail.uberspace.de>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

Zitat von Anand Moon <moon.linux@yahoo.com>:
> http://ark.intel.com/products/64622/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E5-4650-20M-Cache-2_70-GHz-8_00-GTs-Intel-QPI
>
> Show it has only 8 core of CPU. Why are you setting the CONFIG_NR_CPUS=64.
> certainly it will have a issue in the kernel.
Why would that lead to issues? AFAIK all it does is set the size of  
the array which contains CPU data, setting it higher would only result  
in some kilobytes of memory being used...

Jan