All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Lunxue Dai <lunxue.dai@rock-chips.com>,
	Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@altera.com>,
	"linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] watchdog: dw_wdt: pat the watchdog before enabling it
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:38:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150128093834.792fb55b@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422397517-20426-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org>

On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:25:16 -0800
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:

> On some dw_wdt implementations the "top" register may be initted to 0
> at bootup.  In such a case, each "pat" of the watchdog will reset the
> timer to 0xffff.  That's pretty short.
> 
> The input clock of the wdt can be any of a wide range of values.  On
> an rk3288 system, I've seen the wdt clock be 24.75 MHz.  That means
> each tick is ~40ns and we'll count to 0xffff in ~2.6ms.
> 
> Because of the above two facts, it's a really good idea to pat the
> watchdog after initting the "top" register properly and before
> enabling the watchdog.  If you don't then there's no way we'll get the
> next heartbeat in time.
> 
> Jisheng Zhang fixed this problem on some dw_wdt versions by using the
> TOP_INIT feature.  However, the dw_wdt on rk3288 doesn't have TOP_INIT
> so it's a good idea to also pat the watchdog manually.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Better comments now that we know what's going on.
> - Don't typo dw_wdt as dw_mmc.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Add comment about why TOP_INIT doesn't work on rk3288; move pat
>   to right next to the attempt to use TOP_INIT.
> 
>  drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> index b34a2e4..3dde6de 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> @@ -96,6 +96,12 @@ static inline void dw_wdt_set_next_heartbeat(void)
>  	dw_wdt.next_heartbeat = jiffies + dw_wdt_get_top() * HZ;
>  }
>  
> +static void dw_wdt_keepalive(void)
> +{
> +	writel(WDOG_COUNTER_RESTART_KICK_VALUE, dw_wdt.regs +
> +	       WDOG_COUNTER_RESTART_REG_OFFSET);
> +}
> +
>  static int dw_wdt_set_top(unsigned top_s)
>  {
>  	int i, top_val = DW_WDT_MAX_TOP;
> @@ -110,21 +116,27 @@ static int dw_wdt_set_top(unsigned top_s)
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> -	/* Set the new value in the watchdog. */
> +	/*
> +	 * Set the new value in the watchdog.  Some versions of dw_wdt
> +	 * have have TOPINIT in the TIMEOUT_RANGE register (as per
> +	 * CP_WDT_DUAL_TOP in WDT_COMP_PARAMS_1).  On those we
> +	 * effectively get a pat of the watchdog right here.
> +	 */
>  	writel(top_val | top_val << WDOG_TIMEOUT_RANGE_TOPINIT_SHIFT,
>  		dw_wdt.regs + WDOG_TIMEOUT_RANGE_REG_OFFSET);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Add an explicit pat to handle versions of the watchdog that
> +	 * don't have TOPINIT.  This won't hurt on versions that have
> +	 * it.
> +	 */
> +	dw_wdt_keepalive();
> +
>  	dw_wdt_set_next_heartbeat();
>  
>  	return dw_wdt_top_in_seconds(top_val);
>  }
>  
> -static void dw_wdt_keepalive(void)
> -{
> -	writel(WDOG_COUNTER_RESTART_KICK_VALUE, dw_wdt.regs +
> -	       WDOG_COUNTER_RESTART_REG_OFFSET);
> -}
> -
>  static int dw_wdt_restart_handle(struct notifier_block *this,
>  				unsigned long mode, void *cmd)
>  {

Looks good to me

Thanks

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-01-28  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-27 22:25 [PATCH v3 1/2] watchdog: dw_wdt: pat the watchdog before enabling it Doug Anderson
2015-01-27 22:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] watchdog: dw_wdt: Try to get a 30 second watchdog by default Doug Anderson
2015-02-03 19:02   ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2015-01-28  1:38 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2015-01-28 18:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] watchdog: dw_wdt: pat the watchdog before enabling it Guenter Roeck
2015-02-03 19:01 ` Wim Van Sebroeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150128093834.792fb55b@xhacker \
    --to=jszhang@marvell.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=dinguyen@altera.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=lunxue.dai@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.