From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:39:53 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 04/21] ARM: tegra: collect SoC sources into mach-tegra In-Reply-To: <54C67C29.3040401@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1422166283-20822-1-git-send-email-yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> <1422166283-20822-5-git-send-email-yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> <54C67C29.3040401@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20150128163953.GA20594@amd> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Mon 2015-01-26 10:40:57, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 01/24/2015 11:11 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >This commit moves files as follows: > > > > arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra20/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra20/* > > arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra30/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra30/* > ... > > Bikeshed: I know that this matches what the Linux kernel has for 32-bit ARM, > but I've always disliked using the word "machine" to describe an SoC. Would > just "tegra" or "soc-tegra" be better than "mach-tegra"? Feel free to > entirely ignore this though; I don't feel too strongly. Please keep it consistent with Linux. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html