From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45133) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YH85k-00057W-Ha for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 04:42:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YH85h-0004hu-Cw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 04:42:20 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41583) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YH85h-0004ho-6g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 04:42:17 -0500 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 09:42:12 +0000 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Message-ID: <20150130094211.GC2370@work-vm> References: <1422543997-22808-1-git-send-email-dgilbert@redhat.com> <54CABD7D.5090103@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54CABD7D.5090103@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/1] Incoming migration vs early monitor commands List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: amit.shah@redhat.com, liang.z.li@intel.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, quintela@redhat.com * Paolo Bonzini (pbonzini@redhat.com) wrote: > > > On 29/01/2015 16:06, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote: > > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" > > > > The attached patch allows you to execute QMP commands from the command > > line prior to -incoming or loadvm. > > What about doing the opposite: if you specify -S, and thus the runstate > is PRELAUNCH, allow starting incoming migration from the monitor through > a new QMP command or a new option to the "migrate" command? Yep, see the other half of the thread. Dave > > Paolo > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK