All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/6] clk: Add rate constraints to clocks
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 01:31:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150131013158.GA4323@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CA8662.7040008@codeaurora.org>

On 01/29, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 01/29/15 05:31, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Tomeu, Mike,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
> > <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> wrote:
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> >> @@ -2391,25 +2543,24 @@ int __clk_get(struct clk *clk)
> >>         return 1;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> -static void clk_core_put(struct clk_core *core)
> >> +void __clk_put(struct clk *clk)
> >>  {
> >>         struct module *owner;
> >>
> >> -       owner = core->owner;
> >> +       if (!clk || WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(clk)))
> >> +               return;
> >>
> >>         clk_prepare_lock();
> >> -       kref_put(&core->ref, __clk_release);
> >> +
> >> +       hlist_del(&clk->child_node);
> >> +       clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, clk->core->req_rate);
> > At this point, clk->core->req_rate is still zero, causing
> > cpg_div6_clock_round_rate() to be called with a zero "rate" parameter,
> > e.g. on r8a7791:
> 
> Hmm.. I wonder if we should assign core->req_rate to be the same as
> core->rate during __clk_init()? That would make this call to
> clk_core_set_rate_nolock() a nop in this case.
> 

Here's a patch to do this

---8<----
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH] clk: Assign a requested rate by default

We need to assign a requested rate here so that we avoid
requesting a rate of 0 on clocks when we remove clock consumers.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/clk/clk.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index a29daf9edea4..8416ed1c40be 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -2142,6 +2142,7 @@ int __clk_init(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk_user)
 	struct clk_core *orphan;
 	struct hlist_node *tmp2;
 	struct clk_core *clk;
+	unsigned long rate;
 
 	if (!clk_user)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -2266,12 +2267,13 @@ int __clk_init(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk_user)
 	 * then rate is set to zero.
 	 */
 	if (clk->ops->recalc_rate)
-		clk->rate = clk->ops->recalc_rate(clk->hw,
+		rate = clk->ops->recalc_rate(clk->hw,
 				clk_core_get_rate_nolock(clk->parent));
 	else if (clk->parent)
-		clk->rate = clk->parent->rate;
+		rate = clk->parent->rate;
 	else
-		clk->rate = 0;
+		rate = 0;
+	clk->rate = clk->req_rate = rate;
 
 	/*
 	 * walk the list of orphan clocks and reparent any that are children of
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Cc: Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
	"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Chao Xie <chao.xie@marvell.com>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Emilio L??pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>,
	Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>,
	Bintian Wang <bintian.wang@huawei.com>,
	Matt Porter <mporter@linaro.org>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
	Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@gmail.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/6] clk: Add rate constraints to clocks
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 17:31:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150131013158.GA4323@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CA8662.7040008@codeaurora.org>

On 01/29, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 01/29/15 05:31, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Tomeu, Mike,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
> > <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> wrote:
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> >> @@ -2391,25 +2543,24 @@ int __clk_get(struct clk *clk)
> >>         return 1;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> -static void clk_core_put(struct clk_core *core)
> >> +void __clk_put(struct clk *clk)
> >>  {
> >>         struct module *owner;
> >>
> >> -       owner = core->owner;
> >> +       if (!clk || WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(clk)))
> >> +               return;
> >>
> >>         clk_prepare_lock();
> >> -       kref_put(&core->ref, __clk_release);
> >> +
> >> +       hlist_del(&clk->child_node);
> >> +       clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, clk->core->req_rate);
> > At this point, clk->core->req_rate is still zero, causing
> > cpg_div6_clock_round_rate() to be called with a zero "rate" parameter,
> > e.g. on r8a7791:
> 
> Hmm.. I wonder if we should assign core->req_rate to be the same as
> core->rate during __clk_init()? That would make this call to
> clk_core_set_rate_nolock() a nop in this case.
> 

Here's a patch to do this

---8<----
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH] clk: Assign a requested rate by default

We need to assign a requested rate here so that we avoid
requesting a rate of 0 on clocks when we remove clock consumers.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/clk/clk.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index a29daf9edea4..8416ed1c40be 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -2142,6 +2142,7 @@ int __clk_init(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk_user)
 	struct clk_core *orphan;
 	struct hlist_node *tmp2;
 	struct clk_core *clk;
+	unsigned long rate;
 
 	if (!clk_user)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -2266,12 +2267,13 @@ int __clk_init(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk_user)
 	 * then rate is set to zero.
 	 */
 	if (clk->ops->recalc_rate)
-		clk->rate = clk->ops->recalc_rate(clk->hw,
+		rate = clk->ops->recalc_rate(clk->hw,
 				clk_core_get_rate_nolock(clk->parent));
 	else if (clk->parent)
-		clk->rate = clk->parent->rate;
+		rate = clk->parent->rate;
 	else
-		clk->rate = 0;
+		rate = 0;
+	clk->rate = clk->req_rate = rate;
 
 	/*
 	 * walk the list of orphan clocks and reparent any that are children of
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Cc: Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
	"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Chao Xie <chao.xie@marvell.com>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Emilio L??pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>,
	Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>,
	Bintian Wang <bintian.wang@huawei.com>,
	Matt Porter <mporter@linaro.org>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
	Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@gmail.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/6] clk: Add rate constraints to clocks
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 17:31:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150131013158.GA4323@codeaurora.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20150131013158.b89jIKkCydbT77-mS3kMXmBvmE8nqJXrvPN2_k0W_M4@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CA8662.7040008@codeaurora.org>

On 01/29, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 01/29/15 05:31, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Tomeu, Mike,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
> > <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> wrote:
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> >> @@ -2391,25 +2543,24 @@ int __clk_get(struct clk *clk)
> >>         return 1;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> -static void clk_core_put(struct clk_core *core)
> >> +void __clk_put(struct clk *clk)
> >>  {
> >>         struct module *owner;
> >>
> >> -       owner = core->owner;
> >> +       if (!clk || WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(clk)))
> >> +               return;
> >>
> >>         clk_prepare_lock();
> >> -       kref_put(&core->ref, __clk_release);
> >> +
> >> +       hlist_del(&clk->child_node);
> >> +       clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, clk->core->req_rate);
> > At this point, clk->core->req_rate is still zero, causing
> > cpg_div6_clock_round_rate() to be called with a zero "rate" parameter,
> > e.g. on r8a7791:
> 
> Hmm.. I wonder if we should assign core->req_rate to be the same as
> core->rate during __clk_init()? That would make this call to
> clk_core_set_rate_nolock() a nop in this case.
> 

Here's a patch to do this

---8<----
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH] clk: Assign a requested rate by default

We need to assign a requested rate here so that we avoid
requesting a rate of 0 on clocks when we remove clock consumers.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/clk/clk.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index a29daf9edea4..8416ed1c40be 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -2142,6 +2142,7 @@ int __clk_init(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk_user)
 	struct clk_core *orphan;
 	struct hlist_node *tmp2;
 	struct clk_core *clk;
+	unsigned long rate;
 
 	if (!clk_user)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -2266,12 +2267,13 @@ int __clk_init(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk_user)
 	 * then rate is set to zero.
 	 */
 	if (clk->ops->recalc_rate)
-		clk->rate = clk->ops->recalc_rate(clk->hw,
+		rate = clk->ops->recalc_rate(clk->hw,
 				clk_core_get_rate_nolock(clk->parent));
 	else if (clk->parent)
-		clk->rate = clk->parent->rate;
+		rate = clk->parent->rate;
 	else
-		clk->rate = 0;
+		rate = 0;
+	clk->rate = clk->req_rate = rate;
 
 	/*
 	 * walk the list of orphan clocks and reparent any that are children of
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Cc: Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
	"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Chao Xie <chao.xie@marvell.com>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Emilio L??pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>,
	Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>,
	Bintian Wang <bintian.wang@huawei.com>,
	Matt Porter <mporter@linaro.org>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
	Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@gmail.c>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/6] clk: Add rate constraints to clocks
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 17:31:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150131013158.GA4323@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CA8662.7040008@codeaurora.org>

On 01/29, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 01/29/15 05:31, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Tomeu, Mike,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
> > <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> wrote:
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> >> @@ -2391,25 +2543,24 @@ int __clk_get(struct clk *clk)
> >>         return 1;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> -static void clk_core_put(struct clk_core *core)
> >> +void __clk_put(struct clk *clk)
> >>  {
> >>         struct module *owner;
> >>
> >> -       owner = core->owner;
> >> +       if (!clk || WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(clk)))
> >> +               return;
> >>
> >>         clk_prepare_lock();
> >> -       kref_put(&core->ref, __clk_release);
> >> +
> >> +       hlist_del(&clk->child_node);
> >> +       clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, clk->core->req_rate);
> > At this point, clk->core->req_rate is still zero, causing
> > cpg_div6_clock_round_rate() to be called with a zero "rate" parameter,
> > e.g. on r8a7791:
> 
> Hmm.. I wonder if we should assign core->req_rate to be the same as
> core->rate during __clk_init()? That would make this call to
> clk_core_set_rate_nolock() a nop in this case.
> 

Here's a patch to do this

---8<----
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH] clk: Assign a requested rate by default

We need to assign a requested rate here so that we avoid
requesting a rate of 0 on clocks when we remove clock consumers.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/clk/clk.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index a29daf9edea4..8416ed1c40be 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -2142,6 +2142,7 @@ int __clk_init(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk_user)
 	struct clk_core *orphan;
 	struct hlist_node *tmp2;
 	struct clk_core *clk;
+	unsigned long rate;
 
 	if (!clk_user)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -2266,12 +2267,13 @@ int __clk_init(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk_user)
 	 * then rate is set to zero.
 	 */
 	if (clk->ops->recalc_rate)
-		clk->rate = clk->ops->recalc_rate(clk->hw,
+		rate = clk->ops->recalc_rate(clk->hw,
 				clk_core_get_rate_nolock(clk->parent));
 	else if (clk->parent)
-		clk->rate = clk->parent->rate;
+		rate = clk->parent->rate;
 	else
-		clk->rate = 0;
+		rate = 0;
+	clk->rate = clk->req_rate = rate;
 
 	/*
 	 * walk the list of orphan clocks and reparent any that are children of
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v13 4/6] clk: Add rate constraints to clocks
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 17:31:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150131013158.GA4323@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CA8662.7040008@codeaurora.org>

On 01/29, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 01/29/15 05:31, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Tomeu, Mike,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
> > <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> wrote:
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> >> @@ -2391,25 +2543,24 @@ int __clk_get(struct clk *clk)
> >>         return 1;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> -static void clk_core_put(struct clk_core *core)
> >> +void __clk_put(struct clk *clk)
> >>  {
> >>         struct module *owner;
> >>
> >> -       owner = core->owner;
> >> +       if (!clk || WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(clk)))
> >> +               return;
> >>
> >>         clk_prepare_lock();
> >> -       kref_put(&core->ref, __clk_release);
> >> +
> >> +       hlist_del(&clk->child_node);
> >> +       clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, clk->core->req_rate);
> > At this point, clk->core->req_rate is still zero, causing
> > cpg_div6_clock_round_rate() to be called with a zero "rate" parameter,
> > e.g. on r8a7791:
> 
> Hmm.. I wonder if we should assign core->req_rate to be the same as
> core->rate during __clk_init()? That would make this call to
> clk_core_set_rate_nolock() a nop in this case.
> 

Here's a patch to do this

---8<----
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH] clk: Assign a requested rate by default

We need to assign a requested rate here so that we avoid
requesting a rate of 0 on clocks when we remove clock consumers.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/clk/clk.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index a29daf9edea4..8416ed1c40be 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -2142,6 +2142,7 @@ int __clk_init(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk_user)
 	struct clk_core *orphan;
 	struct hlist_node *tmp2;
 	struct clk_core *clk;
+	unsigned long rate;
 
 	if (!clk_user)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -2266,12 +2267,13 @@ int __clk_init(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk_user)
 	 * then rate is set to zero.
 	 */
 	if (clk->ops->recalc_rate)
-		clk->rate = clk->ops->recalc_rate(clk->hw,
+		rate = clk->ops->recalc_rate(clk->hw,
 				clk_core_get_rate_nolock(clk->parent));
 	else if (clk->parent)
-		clk->rate = clk->parent->rate;
+		rate = clk->parent->rate;
 	else
-		clk->rate = 0;
+		rate = 0;
+	clk->rate = clk->req_rate = rate;
 
 	/*
 	 * walk the list of orphan clocks and reparent any that are children of
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-31  1:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 186+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-23 11:03 [PATCH v13 0/6] Per-user clock constraints Tomeu Vizoso
2015-01-23 11:03 ` [PATCH v13 1/6] clk: Remove unneeded NULL checks Tomeu Vizoso
2015-01-23 11:03 ` [PATCH v13 2/6] clk: Remove __clk_register Tomeu Vizoso
2015-01-23 11:03 ` [PATCH v13 3/6] clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk instances Tomeu Vizoso
2015-01-23 11:03   ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-02-01 21:24   ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-01 21:24     ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-01 21:24     ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-02 17:04     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 17:04       ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 17:32       ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-02 17:32         ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-02 19:32     ` Tero Kristo
2015-02-02 19:32       ` Tero Kristo
2015-02-02 19:32       ` Tero Kristo
2015-02-02 20:44       ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 20:44         ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 22:48         ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-02 22:48           ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-02 23:11           ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 23:11             ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 22:41       ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-02 22:41         ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-02 22:52         ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-02 22:52           ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-03  7:03         ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-02-03  7:03           ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-02-03  8:46           ` Tero Kristo
2015-02-03  8:46             ` Tero Kristo
2015-02-03  8:46             ` Tero Kristo
2015-02-03 15:22             ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-03 15:22               ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 20:45     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-02 20:45       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-02 20:45       ` [Cocci] " Stephen Boyd
2015-02-02 21:31       ` Julia Lawall
2015-02-02 21:31         ` Julia Lawall
2015-02-02 21:31         ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2015-02-02 22:35         ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-02 22:35           ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-02 22:35           ` [Cocci] " Stephen Boyd
2015-02-02 22:50           ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-02 22:50             ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-02 22:50             ` [Cocci] " Mike Turquette
2015-02-03 16:04             ` Quentin Lambert
2015-02-03 16:04               ` Quentin Lambert
2015-02-03 16:04               ` Quentin Lambert
2015-02-04 23:26               ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-04 23:26                 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-04 23:26                 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-05 15:45                 ` Quentin Lambert
2015-02-05 15:45                   ` Quentin Lambert
2015-02-05 15:45                   ` Quentin Lambert
2015-02-05 16:02                   ` Quentin Lambert
2015-02-05 16:02                     ` Quentin Lambert
2015-02-05 16:02                     ` Quentin Lambert
2015-02-06  1:49                     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-06  1:49                       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-06  1:49                       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-06  2:15                   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-06  2:15                     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-06  2:15                     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-06  9:01                     ` Quentin Lambert
2015-02-06  9:01                       ` Quentin Lambert
2015-02-06  9:01                       ` Quentin Lambert
2015-02-06  9:12                       ` Julia Lawall
2015-02-06  9:12                         ` Julia Lawall
2015-02-06  9:12                         ` Julia Lawall
2015-02-06 17:15                         ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-06 17:15                           ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-06 17:15                           ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-17 22:01                     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-17 22:01                       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-17 22:01                       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-03-12 17:20                       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-12 17:20                         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-12 17:20                         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-12 19:43                         ` Stephen Boyd
2015-03-12 19:43                           ` Stephen Boyd
2015-03-12 19:43                           ` Stephen Boyd
2015-03-13  3:29                           ` Shawn Guo
2015-03-13  3:29                             ` Shawn Guo
2015-03-13  3:29                             ` Shawn Guo
2015-03-13  8:20                             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-13  8:20                               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-13  8:20                               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-13 13:42                               ` Shawn Guo
2015-03-13 13:42                                 ` Shawn Guo
2015-03-13 13:42                                 ` Shawn Guo
2015-03-13 17:42                             ` Stephen Boyd
2015-03-13 17:42                               ` Stephen Boyd
2015-03-13 17:42                               ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-05 19:44   ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2015-02-05 19:44     ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2015-02-05 20:06     ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2015-02-05 20:06       ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2015-02-05 20:07     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-05 20:07       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-05 22:14       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-05 22:14         ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-06  0:42         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-06  0:42           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-06  1:35           ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-06  1:35             ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-06 13:39             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-06 13:39               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-06 19:30               ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-06 19:30                 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-06 19:37                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-06 19:37                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-06 19:41                   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-06 19:41                     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-19 21:32                 ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-19 21:32                   ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-24 14:08                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-24 14:08                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-25  2:18                     ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-25  2:18                       ` Mike Turquette
2015-01-23 11:03 ` [PATCH v13 4/6] clk: Add rate constraints to clocks Tomeu Vizoso
2015-01-23 11:03   ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-01-23 11:03   ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-01-29 13:31   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-01-29 13:31     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-01-29 13:31     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-01-29 13:31     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-01-29 19:13     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-01-29 19:13       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-01-29 19:13       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-01-29 19:13       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-01-31  1:31       ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-01-31  1:31         ` Stephen Boyd
2015-01-31  1:31         ` Stephen Boyd
2015-01-31  1:31         ` Stephen Boyd
2015-01-31  1:31         ` Stephen Boyd
2015-01-31 18:36         ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-01-31 18:36           ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-01-31 18:36           ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-01-31 18:36           ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-01-31 18:36           ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-02-01 22:18           ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-01 22:18             ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-01 22:18             ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-01 22:18             ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-01 22:18             ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-02  7:59             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-02-02  7:59               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-02-02  7:59               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-02-02  7:59               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-02-02  7:59               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-02-02 16:12               ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 16:12                 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 16:12                 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 16:12                 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 16:12                 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 17:46                 ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-02 17:46                   ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-02 17:46                   ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-02 17:46                   ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-02 17:46                   ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-02 17:49                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-02 17:49                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-02 17:49                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-02 17:49                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-02 17:49                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-02 19:21                   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 19:21                     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 19:21                     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 19:21                     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 19:21                     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 20:47                     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 20:47                       ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 20:47                       ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 20:47                       ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-02 20:47                       ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-23 11:03 ` [PATCH v13 5/6] clkdev: Export clk_register_clkdev Tomeu Vizoso
2015-01-23 11:03   ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-02-03 17:35   ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-02-03 17:35     ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-02-03 17:43     ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-02-03 17:43       ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-23 11:03 ` [PATCH v13 6/6] clk: Add module for unit tests Tomeu Vizoso
2015-01-27  0:55 ` [PATCH v13 0/6] Per-user clock constraints Stephen Boyd
2015-01-27  6:29   ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-01-28  6:59   ` Tomeu Vizoso
     [not found]     ` <20150129022633.22722.78592@quantum>
2015-01-29  6:41       ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-01-29 14:29         ` Mike Turquette

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150131013158.GA4323@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.