From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754177AbbBBRco (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2015 12:32:44 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:37057 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752080AbbBBRcn (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2015 12:32:43 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 18:32:32 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Vince Weaver Cc: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eranian@gmail.com, jolsa@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] perf: Add a bit of paranoia Message-ID: <20150202173232.GG24151@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20150123125159.696530128@infradead.org> <20150123125834.150481799@infradead.org> <20150126162639.GA21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150129144749.GC24151@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150202154240.GG26304@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150202154240.GG26304@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 04:42:40PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:33:14AM -0500, Vince Weaver wrote: > > [407484.309136] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > [407484.588602] <> [] perf_prepare_sample+0x2ec/0x3c0 > > [407484.597358] [] __perf_event_overflow+0x10e/0x270 > > [407484.604708] [] ? __perf_event_overflow+0xd9/0x270 > > [407484.612215] [] ? perf_tp_event+0xc4/0x210 > > [407484.619000] [] ? __perf_sw_event+0x72/0x1f0 > > [407484.625937] [] ? perf_swevent_overflow+0xa9/0xe0 > > [407484.633287] [] perf_swevent_overflow+0xa9/0xe0 > > [407484.640467] [] perf_swevent_event+0x67/0x90 > > [407484.647343] [] perf_tp_event+0xc4/0x210 > > [407484.653923] [] ? lock_acquire+0x119/0x130 > > [407484.660606] [] ? perf_trace_lock_acquire+0x146/0x180 > > [407484.668332] [] ? __lock_acquire.isra.31+0x3af/0xfe0 > > [407484.675962] [] perf_trace_lock_acquire+0x146/0x180 > > [407484.683490] [] ? lock_acquire+0x119/0x130 > > [407484.690211] [] lock_acquire+0x119/0x130 > > [407484.696750] [] ? perf_event_wakeup+0x5/0xf0 > > [407484.703640] [] ? kill_fasync+0xf/0xf0 > > [407484.710008] [] perf_event_wakeup+0x38/0xf0 > > [407484.716798] [] ? perf_event_wakeup+0x5/0xf0 > > [407484.723696] [] perf_pending_event+0x33/0x60 > > [407484.730570] [] irq_work_run_list+0x4c/0x80 > > [407484.737392] [] irq_work_run+0x18/0x40 > > [407484.743765] [] smp_trace_irq_work_interrupt+0x3f/0xc0 > > [407484.751579] [] trace_irq_work_interrupt+0x6d/0x80 > > [407484.799195] ---[ end trace 55752a03ec8ab979 ]--- > > That looks like tail recursive fun! An irq work that raises and irq work > ad infinitum. Lemme see if I can squash that.. didn't we have something > like this before... /me goes look. Does this make it go away? --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -4413,6 +4413,8 @@ static void perf_pending_event(struct ir struct perf_event *event = container_of(entry, struct perf_event, pending); + int rctx = perf_swevent_get_recursion_context(); + if (event->pending_disable) { event->pending_disable = 0; __perf_event_disable(event); @@ -4422,6 +4424,8 @@ static void perf_pending_event(struct ir event->pending_wakeup = 0; perf_event_wakeup(event); } + + perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(rctx); } /*