From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933266AbbBDAT7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2015 19:19:59 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:58139 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932145AbbBDAT4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2015 19:19:56 -0500 Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:19:55 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20150203.161955.1916354877509427788.davem@davemloft.net> To: dwmw2@infradead.org Cc: mst@redhat.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tun: orphan an skb on tx From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1422862030.11044.86.camel@infradead.org> References: <1422826183.11044.72.camel@infradead.org> <20150201.210716.588479604128207372.davem@davemloft.net> <1422862030.11044.86.camel@infradead.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.7 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:19:56 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: David Woodhouse Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 07:27:10 +0000 > I'm guessing you don't want to push the *whole* management of the TLS > control connection *and* the UDP transport, and probing the latter with > keepalives, into the kernel? I certainly don't :) Whilst Herbert Xu and I have discussed in the past supporting automatic SSL handling of socket data during socket writes in the kernel, doing TLS stuff would be a bit of a stretch :-) From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YInhK-0006pq-BK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 19:20:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YInhG-0003Kx-W3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 19:20:02 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([2001:4f8:3:36:211:85ff:fe63:a549]:44884) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YInhG-0003JO-QF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 19:19:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:19:55 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20150203.161955.1916354877509427788.davem@davemloft.net> From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1422862030.11044.86.camel@infradead.org> References: <1422826183.11044.72.camel@infradead.org> <20150201.210716.588479604128207372.davem@davemloft.net> <1422862030.11044.86.camel@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tun: orphan an skb on tx List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dwmw2@infradead.org Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, mst@redhat.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org From: David Woodhouse Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 07:27:10 +0000 > I'm guessing you don't want to push the *whole* management of the TLS > control connection *and* the UDP transport, and probing the latter with > keepalives, into the kernel? I certainly don't :) Whilst Herbert Xu and I have discussed in the past supporting automatic SSL handling of socket data during socket writes in the kernel, doing TLS stuff would be a bit of a stretch :-)