From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54459) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ15M-0001VE-Mw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 09:37:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ15I-0004S4-7v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 09:37:44 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50843) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ15I-0004S0-0Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 09:37:40 -0500 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t14Ebd32032326 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:37:39 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 14:37:35 +0000 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Message-ID: <20150204143735.GJ2329@work-vm> References: <20150204113229.GN3032@redhat.com> <20150204130821.GH2329@work-vm> <54D22C53.3070909@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54D22C53.3070909@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Universal encryption on QEMU I/O channels List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: amit.shah@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, quintela@redhat.com * Paolo Bonzini (pbonzini@redhat.com) wrote: > > > On 04/02/2015 14:08, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > 3) I'd considered making a separate socket/fd for passing page data > > in the hope of maybe making that page take data via splice; but am not > > sure yet. > > There were even patches for this: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-11/msg04006.html > > The submitter disappeared together with Anthony, but the patches were > pretty good and reused some of the RDMA hooks. Yep, I looked at those a while back and intend to have another look at some time; I think they were primarily intended for same-host migration to upgrade running QEMU instances. Dave > > Paolo -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK