From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32864)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>) id 1YJNfk-0001jv-SK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 09:44:49 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>) id 1YJNff-0000Sw-Tb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 09:44:48 -0500
Received: from e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.107]:49328)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>) id 1YJNff-0000Rs-KB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 09:44:43 -0500
Received: from /spool/local
	by e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use
	Only! Violators will be prosecuted
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> from <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>;
	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:44:42 -0000
Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com
	(d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197])
	by d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B551B0805F
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu,  5 Feb 2015 14:44:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com
	[9.149.37.216])
	by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with
	ESMTP id t15EieIK8978800
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:44:41 GMT
Received: from d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with
	ESMTP id t15EidUk022864
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 07:44:40 -0700
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:44:35 +0100
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20150205154435.4366b6c8.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150205143836.GI19277@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
References: <20150204113229.GN3032@redhat.com> <54D213E0.8090408@redhat.com>
	<20150204130041.GQ3032@redhat.com> <54D221BC.50008@redhat.com>
	<20150205143836.GI19277@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Universal encryption on QEMU I/O channels
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:38:36 +0000
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 02:42:20PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > GIO has TLS bindings (not SASL I think?) in GIO 2.28.  Currently we
> > require glib 2.12 (released 2006) on POSIX systems and glib 2.20
> > (released 2009) on Windows.  That's very conservative indeed, I wouldn't
> > mind changing to a newer version.
> 
> Yes, the glib 2.12 requirement is too conservative.  We can definitely
> move to a higher version.
> 
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.6 is on 2.28.
> Debian wheezy (stable) is on glib 2.33.

SLES 11 SP 3 seems to be on 2.22, so I don't think we can go later than
that yet.