From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173023pub.verizon.net (vms173023pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.23]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FED65CF5 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 16:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([108.28.89.130]) by vms173023.mailsrvcs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.32.0 64bit (built Jul 16 2014)) with ESMTPSA id <0NJK002ISCLM4H00@vms173023.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:03:27 -0600 (CST) X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=QM3fnbPO c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=ckUr7rGttv+NBxkAVUaaIw==:117 a=jLWw55sr_RoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=0gcC27t9AAAA:8 a=oR5dmqMzAAAA:8 a=-9mUelKeXuEA:10 a=0HtSIViG9nkA:10 a=5_saELtod-aGW0FWPvQA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DE58120099; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:03:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:03:21 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: "Burton, Ross" Message-id: <20150210160321.GA14949@denix.org> References: <0NIX00GV1Z8KO910@vms173019.mailsrvcs.net> <20150129193358.GB2517@denix.org> <20150129200648.GC2517@denix.org> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <20150129200648.GC2517@denix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: OE-core , Denys Dmytriyenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] u-boot: update to version 2015.01 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 16:03:49 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 03:06:48PM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 07:59:09PM +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 29 January 2015 at 19:33, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > > > > I believe I had that in DEPENDS... I'll check. > > > > > > So, yes, the patch does have DEPENDS = "openssl" > > > > > > Does it become openssl-native due to BBCLASSEXTEND = "native"? Or do I > > > need a > > > separate DEPENDS_class-native? > > > > > > Unless you have an explicit DEPENDS_class-native assignment, openssl will > > become openssl-native. > > Ok, as I suspected... Then, I'm not really sure what the problem might be. So, just in case, I've added DEPENDS_class-native explicitly and sent a v2 of the patch. Please let me know how it works. Thanks. -- Denys